ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Sunflowers growing in pots were placed, with their roots submerged, in the pond contaminated with radioactive elements. The sunflowers kept growing; in the process, they absorbed radioactive elements. Within twelve days, 85 percent of the radioactive elements were removed from the water, which is no less than can be accomplished with the much more expensive conventional filtration techniques. Scientists therefore propose using sunflowers for decontamination wherever there are radioactively contaminated ponds.

Which of the following, if true, points to a limitation on the applicability of the proposed method of decontamination?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 8982|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-2-19

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-10 02:15:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-2-19

Q19:


Sunflowers growing in pots were placed, with their roots submerged, in the pond contaminated with radioactive elements.  The sunflowers kept growing; in the process, they absorbed radioactive elements.  Within twelve days, 85 percent of the radioactive elements were removed from the water, which is no less than can be accomplished with the much more expensive conventional filtration techniques.  Scientists therefore propose using sunflowers for decontamination wherever there are radioactively contaminated ponds.





Which of the following, if true, points to a limitation on the applicability of the proposed method of decontamination?






  1. Some plants other than sunflowers can also remove radioactive elements from water.

  2. The water in many ponds contaminated with radioactive elements is so cold that it would kill sunflowers whose roots were submerged in it.

  3. Sunflowers that grow with their roots submerged in water grow less well than sunflowers growing under optimal conditions on dry land.

  4. Only species of sunflowers with large leaves can have their roots submerged in water and still keep growing.

  5. In ponds in which the circulation of the water is artificially increased, sunflowers absorb radioactive elements far faster than they do in other ponds.

   Answer: ? Thanks


沙发
发表于 2004-9-10 06:01:00 | 只看该作者
B
板凳
发表于 2004-9-10 11:42:00 | 只看该作者

Agree with B.

地板
发表于 2004-9-10 12:07:00 | 只看该作者
B
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-10 12:24:00 | 只看该作者
Thanks.
6#
发表于 2005-7-22 18:35:00 | 只看该作者
YES IT IS B。
7#
发表于 2006-6-17 12:00:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用valarie在2004-9-10 2:15:00的发言:

Q19:

Sunflowers growing in pots were placed, with their roots submerged, in the pond contaminated with radioactive elements.  The sunflowers kept growing; in the process, they absorbed radioactive elements.  Within twelve days, 85 percent of the radioactive elements were removed from the water, which is no less than can be accomplished with the much more expensive conventional filtration techniques.  Scientists therefore propose using sunflowers for decontamination wherever there are radioactively contaminated ponds.

Which of the following, if true, points to a limitation on the applicability of the proposed method of decontamination?

  1. Some plants other than sunflowers can also remove radioactive elements from water.
  2. The water in many ponds contaminated with radioactive elements is so cold that it would kill sunflowers whose roots were submerged in it.
  3. Sunflowers that grow with their roots submerged in water grow less well than sunflowers growing under optimal conditions on dry land.
  4. Only species of sunflowers with large leaves can have their roots submerged in water and still keep growing.
  5. In ponds in which the circulation of the water is artificially increased, sunflowers absorb radioactive elements far faster than they do in other ponds.

   Answer: ? Thanks


so, B means that the ponds surveyed and the ponds intended to be applicated are different?

otherwise, B would be incorrect ?

8#
发表于 2007-11-18 14:42:00 | 只看该作者

我选的D。

B中说is so cold that it would kill sunflowers whose roots were submerged in it.

但是文中已经说了The sunflowers kept growing

所以如果选B不就是反对前提了吗??

D是对该措施的可行性提出问题,所以是weaken,不是吗?

9#
发表于 2007-11-18 16:59:00 | 只看该作者
可是D不能算是削弱,結論還是成立的啊。但B也的確有問題。哪位來給個完整的解釋啊
10#
发表于 2007-11-18 17:17:00 | 只看该作者
The Key word is "limitation". B clearly identify the limitation that the method can not be applied to some bonds with low temperature.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-28 03:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部