gwd-3-16

Q16:

Economist:  Tropicorp, which constantly seeks profitable investment opportunities, has been buying and clearing sections of tropical forest for cattle ranching, although pastures newly created there become useless for grazing after just a few years.  The company has not gone into rubber tapping, even though greater profits can be made from rubber tapping, which leaves the forest intact.  Thus, some environmentalists conclude that Tropicorp has not acted wholly out of economic self-interest.  However, these environmentalists are probably wrong.  The initial investment required for a successful rubber-tapping operation is larger than that needed for a cattle ranch.  Furthermore, there is a shortage of workers employable in rubber-tapping operations, and finally, taxes are higher on profits from rubber tapping than on profits from cattle ranching.

In the economist’s argument, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A.    The first supports the conclusion of the economist’s argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.

B.    The first states the conclusion of the economist’s argument; the second supports that conclusion.

C.     The first supports the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second states that conclusion.

D.    The first states the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second states the conclusion of the economist’s argument.

e.) Each supports the conclusion of the economist’s argument.

竟然选 c ??

''some environmentalists conclude that Tropicorp has not acted wholly out of economic self-interest....'' 这句话是Environmentalist, 而不是Economist 的呀...

请各位赐教...

The company has not gone into rubber tapping, even though greater profits can be made from rubber tapping, which leaves the forest intact.  Thus, some environmentalists conclude that Tropicorp has not acted wholly out of economic self-interest.

C is indeed the best answer.

The second BF is what the environmentalists conclude (indirect reported speech, 间接引语).  The first BF is what these environmentalists cite as evidence (please pay attention to the highlighted "Thus")

but economists said, '... However, these environmentalists are probably wrong. ...', obviously, the environmentalists'conclusion is different from economists'....

confused...or i misunderstand something else?...

C.     The first supports the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second states that conclusion.

Both the BFs and choice C are about the environmentalists' opinion.  They don't have much to do with the economist's thinking.

Tropicorp has not acted wholly out of economic self-interest.

请问这句话如何理解？

Tropicorp还不完全是自私自利的。对吗？

对吗？

对

我认为1st仍是Economist所说，只是1st被environmentalist拿来引用，并以推出结论。因此选﹙C﹚