[求助]大全-3-20

20.   The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.

When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.

Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?

(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.

(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.

(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.

(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.（E）

(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

Why E? And I found I cannot understand correctly it.((((((

Hi,Thanks,

but I cannot find it

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=41497

题目说在候选人同意自己被题名之前，他必须知道其他被题名的人

题干说 候选人在同意自己被题名之后，才可以知道其他被题名的人

所以结果是：如果候选人超过一个，没有人被题名

我也做错了，不过，自己看了一遍别人的解释，又转告你一遍就清楚了，妹妹，继续讨论疑点，请

请教,我怎么觉得是:若有大于一个被提名者时,

                  可能的被提名者必须在被告知还有哪些其他被提名者后,必须同意被提名.

                    所以这一制度没法执行...

也不知这样想对不对

我觉得题目和提干是互相矛盾的两种方法啊，为什么这道题里要有这两者矛盾说法？最后选择的logic是针对题目还是提干啊？

还有，consent to nomination 指同意对自己的提名还是对他人的提名阿

题目的意思是，如果proposal是必要的话，而proposal的情况又“cannot”，会发生什么结果？

正是因为是矛盾的，所以当不止一个人被提名时，就完蛋了。

同意自己接受提名（承诺接受）。

我的理解方式是~當A要被提名時，必須先交一份被提名同意書，在交這份同意書之前，A必須被告知其他要被提名的人是誰~~~所以若有A,B,C要被提名，究竟誰要先交同意書? 誰必須先知道還有哪些被提名人?? 這根本不可能達成~ 因為  被告知還有哪些被提名人---->交同意書--->被提名     A,B,C三人根本不可能在這種模式下被提名!

明白了

看大家之前的讨论，对我来说真的受益匪浅！谢谢各位啦~