ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 27893|回复: 67
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-5-3

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-19 21:28:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-5-3

I choose B, but the answer is C. I don't get it. Can anybody help me figure it out? Thanks a lot.



"The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia.  Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed.  However, recent statistics show a droip in the number of television assemblers in Borodia.  Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.






Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?






  1. The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.

  2. Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.

  3. The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.

  4. The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years.

  5. The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years."


沙发
发表于 2004-6-20 01:11:00 | 只看该作者

C is the assumption. C states that the time of a B assembler to assemble a TV hasn't drop, we know, sum= N(assemebler) * working hour / T ( time needed to assemble a TV). To be symplified, sum=N*H/ T, if T drop, even N drop, then sum will probably not drop. C declares that T hasn't drop.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-20 23:15:00 | 只看该作者
A vert tricky question. Anyway, I got it. Thanks very much
地板
发表于 2004-8-26 16:58:00 | 只看该作者
能解释一下"E"错在哪吗?
5#
发表于 2004-9-17 23:57:00 | 只看该作者
这道题好BT啊,第一句话,The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia.  和整个论证有啥关系啊,我就是被第一句话害的,足足看了差不多4分钟才选的答案
6#
发表于 2004-9-19 19:02:00 | 只看该作者
我做这道题磨蹭了半天看c比较象就选了。有些很trick的题目只能排除了。。。
7#
发表于 2004-10-2 16:48:00 | 只看该作者
把e取非,其实对原文推理没有任何破坏作用呀。所以e不对了。
8#
发表于 2004-10-12 14:47:00 | 只看该作者
那D为什么错呀?
9#
发表于 2004-10-21 12:36:00 | 只看该作者
这个题目的意思是说:中国比美国的人工要低,美国即使在最近三年降低了中国的关税,但是电视从中国进口量仍然不高。所以,工资和关税都不是导致从中国进口量增加的原因。但是,因为最近的调查显示,美国本土的电视组装工人减少了,所以如果美国的每年电视需求量是一定的话,而且工人的工作效率没有增加的话,也就是说每年美国的电视产量减少了,那么从中国的进口量必然增加

应该是这样理解吧?


10#
发表于 2004-11-16 13:32:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用flying04在2004-10-21 12:36:00的发言:
这个题目的意思是说:中国比美国的人工要低,美国即使在最近三年降低了中国的关税,但是电视从中国进口量仍然不高。所以,工资和关税都不是导致从中国进口量增加的原因。但是,因为最近的调查显示,美国本土的电视组装工人减少了,所以如果美国的每年电视需求量是一定的话,而且工人的工作效率没有增加的话,也就是说每年美国的电视产量减少了,那么从中国的进口量必然增加

应该是这样理解吧?





这个解释好。充分解释了第一句话的作用。


这句话很饶的。设了一个套,做题目的时候,突然发觉这句没用,然后看选项的时候,就开始迷糊了。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-28 02:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部