快考了，多多打搅：大全-20-8

Any serious policy discussion about acceptable levels of risk in connection with explosions is not well served if the participants fail to use the word “explosion” and use the phrase “energetic disassembly” instead. In fact, the word “explosion” elicits desirable reactions, such as a heightened level of attention, whereas the substitute phrase does not. Therefore, of the two terms, “explosion” is the one that should be used throughout discussions of this sort.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

(A) In the kind of discussion at issue, the advantages of desirable reactions to the term “explosion” outweigh the drawbacks, if any, arising from undesirable reactions to that term.

(B) The phrase “energetic disassembly” has not so far been used as a substitute for the word “explosion” in the kind of discussion at issue.

(C) In any serious policy discussion, what is said by the participants is more important than how it is put into words.

(D) The only reason that people would have for using “energetic disassembly” in place of “explosion” is to render impossible any serious policy discussion concerning explosions.（A）

(E) The phrase “energetic disassembly” is not necessarily out of place in describing a controlled rather than an accidental explosion.

请教一下这体解题思路，偶看不懂题目想表达的意思。谢谢！

典型的桥梁型假设

1。原文逻辑：“EXPLOSION”引起好的反应，另一个词“ENERGENIC ASSEMBLY”没有-------应使用“EXPLOSION”这个词。

2。A将1中黑体字部分搭起来：好反应比不好反应更好

In fact, the word “explosion” elicits desirable reactions, such as a heightened level of attention, whereas the substitute phrase does not. Therefore, of the two terms, “explosion” is the one that should be used throughout discussions of this sort.

“explosion” ——desirable reactions；

“explosion" ——  should be used throughout discussions of this sort.

桥梁：把红色字体部分连接起来——这是偶得理解。

但是选项A表达的意思好像不是这样的哦？

不好意思翻出一道老题，请问哪位NN能翻译一下题目和选项A啊，偶实在不太明白在讲什么。十万个感谢先！