ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 26779|回复: 33
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请提问吧,我尽量解答:几个题目的解答

[精华] [复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-5-16 08:46:00 | 只看该作者

请提问吧,我尽量解答:几个题目的解答

对不起刚才电脑死机,晚了几分钟...


请大家跟贴贴出你的问题.谢谢


沙发
发表于 2004-5-16 08:55:00 | 只看该作者



晚上好Mindfree:

关于逻辑问题

1. The reason much refrigerated food spoils is that it ends up out of sight at the back of the shelf. So why not have round shelves that rotate? Because such rotating shelves would have just the same sort of drawback, since things would fall off the shelves’ edges into the rear corners.

Which of the following is presupposed in the argument against introducing rotating shelves?

(A) Refrigerators would not be made so that their interior space is cylindrical.
(B) Refrigerators would not be made to have a window in front for easy viewing of their contents without opening the door.
(C) The problem of spoilage of refrigerated food is not amenable to any solution based on design changes.
(D) Refrigerators are so well designed that there are bound to be drawbacks to any design change.(A)
(E) Rotating shelves would be designed to rotate only while the refrigerator door was open.

这题B,E可以轻松排除,其他选项A,C,D就不懂错在哪里,为什么对?

The assumption of the argument is that the fridge is still boxy and the items pushed over the edge of the round shelf will fall. So if the fridge is round itself, the round shelf will be able to hold everything.

还是有点不明白,请看下面偶画了一个水平截面的俯视图>.


[attachimg]15737[/attachimg]
里面的为round shelf, 外面的为interior space,这样看是不是两个里面放食物都有可能从shelf edge 翻落?还是说内外两个图形应该接近与相切,这样,左图中的食品可以从后面两个角落里落下?而圆形的就不可以了?

但是这样思考也太费时费力了,请问mindfree看到题目时的思路是怎样的?谢谢!


因前一段时间一直在恶补最薄弱的语法,还没来得及整理逻辑部分,所以今天先请教积累到目前为止的,在语法专区讨论过,但还没确切结论的题目。谢谢!
I have to say that I am not ready to explain SC as it is all about the grammar points. That is why I use this time only for CR. I have to go over my notes before I can answer your questions fully.

1. 关于一些词组

discriminate A from Bdiscriminate between A and B 的用法区别
Can you give me some examples? Btw, is it distinguish or discriminate
1. After a few weeks’ experience, apprentice jewelers can usually begin to discriminate, though not with absolute certainty, genuine diamonds from imitation diamonds.

(A) genuine diamonds from imitation diamonds
(B) genuine diamonds apart from imitations
(C) between genuine diamonds and imitation diamonds
(D) among genuine diamonds and imitation diamonds(C)
(E) whether diamonds are imitation or genuine

2. 关于ETS的一些解释

常常看到ETS解释里用到nonidiomatic和unidiomatic两个单词,如下两个例题,两者有什么区别?还是仅仅是用词多样性的一种体现?

150. In the mid-1960’s a newly installed radar warning system mistook the rising of the moon as a massive missile attack by the Soviets.

(A) rising of the moon as a massive missile attack by the Soviets
(B) rising of the moon for a massive Soviet missile attack
(C) moon rising to a massive missile attack by the Soviets
(D) moon as it was rising for a massive Soviet missile attack(B)
(E) rise of the moon as a massive Soviet missile attack

Choice B is best because it alone correctly handles the idiom to mistake x for y. Though choice D manages the correct preposition, for, the phrase the moon as it was rising for is less efficient and precise than the phrasing of choice B: since rising functions as a verb in D, the phrase for a massive... attack now seems to modify rising rather than mistook. Choice C incorrectly uses mistook... to, and choices A and E incorrectly use mistake... as. Choice E also employs the nonidiomatic rise of the moon.

52.   The rising of costs of data-processing operations at many financial institutions has created a growing opportunity for independent companies to provide these services more efficiently and at lower cost.

(A) The rising of costs
(B) Rising costs
(C) The rising cost
(D) Because the rising cost(C)
(E) Because of rising costs

C is the best choice. In choice A, The rising of costs is unidiomatic, and in B costs... has lacks subject-verb agreement. Choices D and E produce sentence fragments since Because makes the clause subordinate rather than independent.

I think they are the same

3. 关于一些真题

1) princeton 一道题

Three percent of beer volume is alcohol, compared with wine's twelve percent and whiskey, cognac, and rum's forty percent.

A. Three percent of beer volume is alcohol, compared with wine's twelve percent and whiskey,
     cognac, and rum's forty percent

B.  Three percent of beer volume is alcohol, of wine it is twelve percent, and of whiskey,cognac,
     and rum it is forty percent

C. By volume, beer is three percent alcohol, compared with wine, which is twelve percent
    alcohol; whiskey, rum and cognac are each forty percent alcohol

D. The percentage of beer volume that is alcohol is three, compared with wine's twelve,
     whiskey's forty, cognac's forty, and rum's forty.

E.  The percentage of beer volume that is alcohol is three; that of wine is twelve, and that of
      whiskey, cognac, and rum is forty.

答案是C,beer is three percent alcohol, 这样说可以吗?

下面是引用Tony的说法
“beer is three percent alcohol 是idiomatic的, 基本用于表示组成成分, 其他的比如:

Wellesley is 100 percent women.  The cape is 80 percent wool. etc.

C是表达此题意思的最好方式, 当然, 如果一定要改, 可以说: By volume, the alcohol percentage in beers is three, compared with that in wines, which is twelve. ”

先不说“Wellesley is 100 percent women.  The cape is 80 percent wool. etc.”这个句子是否正确,光“80 percent wool”之类就听着不顺耳,至少也得是“80 percent of wool”。

"The jacket is 100% wool" is correct. If you want to say somebody is truly a woman, you say "XXXX is 100% woman" instead of "100% of her is woman". If you want to say a class of 50 has 40 female students, you say "80% of the class are women"

2) 又一题

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of the monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

A.  There are legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of the monkfish that can
      be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing

B. There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a
     circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.

C. There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish,
     which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.

D. Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes
     to its depletion by being overfished.

E.  Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish,
      contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.

答案选C,A选项错在哪里呢?

下面引用cmtn的说法:
“个人感觉A中AS不好,AS一般表示平行或递进,不表转折。而句中有比较转折之意思,XX有限制,而MFISH没限制。
如果是:There are no limits, as there are NO limits for MFISH, on the size of xxx, 感觉是不是就不一样。
(比较:There are no limits, as there are limits for MFISH, on the size of xxx,AS有“象XXX一样”的意思,可这里一点也不象,所以AS感觉不好)”

想确认一下上述引用中highlight部分的说法。

Personally I do not think there is a correct answer to this question. "their" in A is wrong. But "which" in C is wrong too. It is very informal and GMAT disallow using "which" for a sentence.

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-16 12:53:13编辑过]

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
板凳
发表于 2004-5-16 09:08:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢mindfree牛牛。我也问语法问题。:)


OG218:


Despite protests from some waste-disposal companies, state health officials have ordered the levels of bacteria in seawater at popular beaches to be measured and that the results be published.


(A) the levels of bacteria in seawater at popular beaches to be measured and that the results be


(B) that seawater at popular beaches should be measured for their levels of bacteria, with the results being


(C) the measure of levels of bacteria in seawater at popular beaches and the results to be


(D) seawater measured at popular beaches for levels of bacteria, with their results


(E) that the levels of bacteria in seawater at popular beaches be measured and the results



答案是E,请问,第二个be被省略了,这样可以吗?能不能说一些省略的原则?谢谢。




Sure it can. But you are asking a huge question. I cannot answer without going back to study grammar


嘻嘻,不好意思,麻烦牛牛了,请有时间的时候告诉我们一下啊,关于省略用法。谢谢了~~~


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-16 9:42:09编辑过]
地板
发表于 2004-5-16 09:18:00 | 只看该作者

再问道语法真题:


When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950's, some, 4000 existed in the US, but today there are less than one-quarter that many.


a、there are less than one-quarter that many


b、there are fewer than one-quarter as many


c、there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount


d、the number is less than one-quarter the amount


e、it is less than one-quarter of that amount


据说答案是C,可我觉得答案是B,请问MINDFREE牛牛的看法?谢谢!


I picked C myself when I saw this question a while ago. Both "as many as" and "fewer than" are used for comparison. And they do not have the same meaning and should not be used at the same time. One extra point for this question: "fewer" should be used here. But we see some questions that use "less" for nouns such as pounds. For example, he weighs 180 pounds, less than half of Tom. Personally I think the reason is that the weight is not separable. We cannot count out one pound after another. Therefore we use less. Any comment?


谢谢牛牛指点,我的问题是,为什么B不对呢?前面说DRIVE-IN,应该是可数名词,可是C里面用了AMOUNT,不是代表不可数名词的吗?请继续指正。


Amount here is the same as number. When use "amount of", it can only be followed by uncountable nouns.


不好意思,我还是没有被CONVINCED。1,为什么B错?2,C里面ONE QUARTER OF THAT AMOUNT,请问这里AMOUNT指什么?不是指DRIVE-IN的数量吗?DRIVE-IN是可数名词,当然应该用NUMBER了啊。请继续指正,谢谢。


I said what I could. "fewer than" and "as many" are contradictory. People simply do not say that. Why wrong? Why "consider sth. as sth." is wrong?


Amount here equals number. When we say "a large amount of money", amount cannot be replaced by number. One example from the dictionary: "an annual output to the amount of 100,000 tons"


不好意思,MINDFREE牛牛,我现在被CONVINCED了B是错误的,可是C也不正确啊。你举的例子,a large amount of money里面,money是不可数名词,所以可以用a large amount of来修饰。第二个例子,output也是个概述性质的名词,比如可以指代water,那么water的量用amount来代表也是正确的。你的意思是amount和number可以互换吗?请指正。
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-16 12:16:08编辑过]
5#
发表于 2004-5-16 09:23:00 | 只看该作者

mindfree 你好!


下面几道逻辑提请帮忙解答:


OG 175.   
Parasitic wasps lay their eggs directly into the eggs of various host insects in exactly the right number for any suitable size of host egg. If they laid too many eggs in a host egg, the developing wasp larvae would compete with each other to the death for nutrients and space.   If too few eggs were laid, portions of the host egg would decay, killing the wasp larvae.
Which of the following conclusions can properly be drawn from the information above?
A. The size of the smallest host egg that a wasp could theoretically parasitize can be determined from  the wasp's egg-laying behavior.
B. Host inscets lack any effective defenses against the form of predation  practiced by parasitic wasps.
c. Parasitic wasps learn from experience how many eggs to lay into the eggs of different host species.
D. Failure to lay enough eggs would lead to the death of the developing wasp larvae more quickly than would laying too many eggs.
E. Parasitic wasps use visual clues to calculate the size a host egg.
Answer: A (donot understand why?) 


175. A is correct simply because wasp know how many eggs to lay in a particular host egg. Therefore, if the wasp can only lay one egg, the host egg is the smallest possible.

Elimination is the best approach for this type of question. B is totally irrelevant because it is not mentioned. C is not correct because it cannot be drawn from the question. We need other condition to reach that conclusion. In another word, we cannot refute other conclusions, such that the wasp has the instinct to lay the right number of eggs. D and E are not correct for the same reason as C.


OG. 181.
Consumer health advocate: Your candy company adds caffeine to your chocolate candy bars so that each one delivers a specified amount of caffeine. Since caffeine is highlly addictive, this indicates that you intend to keep your customers addicted.
Candy manufacturer: Our manufacturing process results in there being less caffeine in each chocolate candy bar than in the unprocessed cacao beans from which the chocolate is made.
The candy manufacture's response is flawed as a refutation of th consumer health advocate's argument because it


A.  fails to address the issue of whether the level of caffeine in the candy bas sold by the      
     manufacturer is enough to keep addicted
B.  assumes without warrant that all unprocessed cacao beans contain a uniform amount of caffeine
C.  does not specify exactly how caffeiene is lost in the manufacturing process
D.  treats the consumer health advocate's argument as though it were about candy bar rather than
     about the manufacturer's candy in genreral
E. merely condradicts the consumer health advocate's conclusion wihtout giving any reason to beleive that the  advocate's reasonging is unsound.


Answer: A
do not understand the explanation: ' The rebuttal is that the cafeine added is restoring to the product caffeine that was lost during manufacture.'   


181. It means that the manufacturer is putting back the caffeine that is lost during the production. When the chocolate is produced, caffeine that is in the raw material is lost. Then the manufacturer adds the caffeine back to the original level. The argument is flawed because it does not address the issue whether the level of caffeine is addctive or not. For the argument is be of merit, the manufacturer needs to add that the original level of caffeine in the raw material is not addictive.

OG 153.
Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-effecient in the last decade. However, threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is , the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty five dollars.
which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?
A. The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.
B. The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occured despite increased raw material costs for that equipment.
C. Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.
D. Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear. rahterr than oil-fired, power plants.
E. When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previouly worth exploiting become economically viable.


Answer: C.


153. I personally think it is one of the most difficult questions. First you have to understand the question. Let me use an example to explain the threshold: in the past, one barrel of oil can produce, say, 1kwh electricity. The viability threshold means that if the barrel of oil costs $35, the solar-power plant can produce the same amount of electricity with the same cost ($35). Now the solar-power plant has improved its efficiency and can produce, say, 2kwh electricity with $35 dollars. But the threshold is still $35. It means that now the oil-fired plant can also produce 2kwh electricity with $35 of oil (a barrel). In another word, the efficiency of oil-fired plant also improved. Therefore, the price of oil does not affect the threshold. If the oil price is significantly lower than $35 per barrel, it means that the solar-powered plant is far away from the threshold, or it is unlikely that the threshold will be reached.



谢谢!



6#
发表于 2004-5-16 10:12:00 | 只看该作者

Mindfree, I really appreciate you for your help!!!


T15:



6.     Advertisement: For sinus pain, three out of four hospitals give their patients Novex. So when you want the most effective painkiller for sinus pain, Novex is the one to choose.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the advertisement’s argument?



(A) Some competing brands of painkillers are intended to reduce other kinds of pain in addition to sinus pain.



(B) Many hospitals that do not usually use Novex will do so for those patients who cannot tolerate the drug the hospitals usually use.



(C) Many drug manufacturers increase sales of their products to hospitals by selling these products to the hospitals at the lowest price the manufacturers can afford.



(D) Unlike some competing brands of painkillers, Novex is available from pharmacies without a doctor’s prescription.(D)



(E) In clinical trials Novex has been found more effective than competing brands of painkillers that have been on the market longer than Novex.



The answer is D , but why C is not right?





C is typical worng answer because for it to be true, you have to have make some assumptions that are beyond what is given in the argument. C did not say whether Noves is cheaper. That is your own assumption that it is cheaper and hospitals prescribe the drug because of the lower cost. In another word, there is no way you can relate C specifically to Novex. D simply provides an exmplanation other thn effectiveness of the drug.


Questions 11-12 are based on the following.



Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game Authority would have the public believe that increases in the number of marine fish caught demonstrate that this resource is no longer endangered. This is a specious argument, as unsound as it would be to assert that the ever-increasing rate at which rain forests are being cut down demonstrates a lack of danger to that resource. The real cause of the increased fish-catch is a greater efficiency in using technologies that deplete resources.



12.   The environmentalist’s statements, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?



(A) The use of technology is the reason for the increasing encroachment of people on nature.



(B) It is possible to determine how many fish are in the sea in some way other than by catching fish.



(C) The proportion of marine fish that are caught is as high as the proportion of rain-forest trees that are cut down each year.



(D) Modern technologies waste resources by catching inedible fish.(E)



(E) Marine fish continue to be an endangered resource.



The answer is E, but why C is wrong?


You have to understand the argument first. The environmentalist is using the rain forest as an example to demonstrate the absurdity of the argument he tries to refute. The fish and the rain forest does not have any direct relationship. Another way is to test C. If C is wrong, will the premises in the argument be wrong too? You can try it yourself. If E is wrong, the premises are wrong becasue the environmentalist says that the conclusion that the fish is no longer engadered is unsound.





T16


2.     The reason much refrigerated food spoils is that it ends up out of sight at the back of the shelf. So why not have round shelves that rotate? Because such rotating shelves would have just the same sort of drawback, since things would fall off the shelves’ edges into the rear corners.



Which of the following is presupposed in the argument against introducing rotating shelves?



(A) Refrigerators would not be made so that their interior space is cylindrical.



(B) Refrigerators would not be made to have a window in front for easy viewing of their contents without opening the door.



(C) The problem of spoilage of refrigerated food is not amenable to any solution based on design changes.



(D) Refrigerators are so well designed that there are bound to be drawbacks to any design change.(A)



(E) Rotating shelves would be designed to rotate only while the refrigerator door was open.



The answer is : A,  why?





The assumption of the argument is that the fridge is still boxy and the items pushed over the edge of the round shelf will fall. So if the fridge is round itself, the round shelf will be able to hold everything.


T17


14.     Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.



Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?



(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.



(B) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased raw material costs for that equipment.



(C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.



(D) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants.(C)



(E) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become economically viable.



   The answer is C, why?   


Explained already in post above.





T18


8.     Consumers in California seeking personal loans have fewer banks to turn to than do consumers elsewhere in the United States. This shortage of competition among banks explains why interest rates on personal loans in California are higher than in any other region of the United States.



Which of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the conclusion above?



(A) Because of the comparatively high wages they must pay to attract qualified workers, California banks charge depositors more than banks elsewhere do for many of the services they offer.



(B) Personal loans are riskier than other types of loans, such as home mortgage loans, that banks make.



(C) Since bank deposits in California are covered by the same type of insurance that guarantees bank deposits in other parts of the United States, they are no less secure than deposits elsewhere.



(D) The proportion of consumers who default on their personal loans is lower in California than in any other region of the United States.(A)



(E) Interest rates paid by California banks to depositors are lower than those paid by banks in other parts of the United States because in California there is less competition to attract depositors.



    The answer is A, why?


Because it offers another reason to explain the high interest rate: expensive labor. Other choices can be eliminated.



15.   Left-handed persons suffer more frequently than do right-handed persons from certain immune disorders, such as allergies. Left-handers tend to have an advantage over the right-handed majority, however, on tasks controlled by the right hemisphere of the brain, and mathematical reasoning is strongly under the influence of the right hemisphere in most people.



If the information above is true, it best supports which of the following hypotheses?



(A) Most people who suffer from allergies or other such immune disorders are left-handed rather than right-handed.



(B) Most left-handed mathematicians suffer from some kind of allergy.



(C) There are proportionally more left-handers among people whose ability to reason mathematically is above average than there are among people with poor mathematical reasoning ability.



(D) If a left-handed person suffers from an allergy, that person will probably be good at mathematics.(C)



(E) There are proportionally more people who suffer from immune disorders such as allergies than there are people who are left-handed or people whose mathematical reasoning ability is unusually good.



The answer is C, why is D wrong?


I do not see the direct relation between allegy and math skills. Probably means normally over 80%. For example, 2 out of 100,000 lefties suffer from allergy while 1 out of 100,000 righties has the same allegy. It is more frequent as said in the question. You definitely cannot get probably from the above exmaple.





T19


6.     Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate themselves naturally, nor even under the spur of nerve-growth stimulants. The reason, recently discovered, is the presence of nerve-growth inhibitors in the spinal cord. Antibodies that deactivate those inhibitors have now been developed. Clearly, then, nerve repair will be a standard medical procedure in the foreseeable future.



Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the accuracy of the prediction above?



(A) Prevention of the regeneration of damaged nerves is merely a by-product of the main function in the human body of the substances inhibiting nerve growth.



(B) Certain nerve-growth stimulants have similar chemical structures to those of the antibodies against nerve-growth inhibitors.



(C) Nerves in the brain are similar to nerves in the spinal cord in their inability to regenerate themselves naturally.



(D) Researchers have been able to stimulate the growth of nerves not located in the spinal cord by using only nerve-growth stimulants.(A)



(E) Deactivating the substances inhibiting nerve growth for an extended period would require a steady supply of antibodies.



The answer is A, how about B


B is beyond the scope to me. I do not know what similar chemical structure leads to. Does it mean that they are the same? I need to make additional assumption to make B correct. And it is not allowed to bring additional consition into the reasoning, unless the additional condition is common sense. I do not think that is common sense.


15.   Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.



Which of the following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the argument to be properly drawn?



(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil.



(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen.



(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.



(D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.(C)



(E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas.



The answer is C, why is it not E?  


The conclusion is to refute that argument that there are 16 species. E does not support the conclusion, but the argument the conclusion is disputing.





T20


12.   An advertisement designed to convince readers of the great durability of automobiles manufactured by the Deluxe Motor Car Company cites as evidence the fact that over half of all automobiles built by the company since 1970 are still on the road today, compared to no more than a third for any other manufacturer.



Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the advertisement’s argument?



(A) After taking inflation into account, a new Deluxe automobile costs only slightly more than a new model did in 1970.



(B) The number of automobiles built by Deluxe each year has not increased sharply since 1970.



(C) Owners of Deluxe automobiles typically keep their cars well maintained.



(D) Since 1970, Deluxe has made fewer changes in the automobiles it manufactures than other car companies have made in their automobiles.(B)



(E) Deluxe automobiles have been selling at relatively stable prices in recent years.



The answer is B, why?


It is a number question. Durability means the car can drive long time. 1970 is used to show that there is a long time between now and then. However, if there was 1000 cars of that model manufactured from 1970's to 1990's, and over 10 million cars manufactured in 2000's, half of the cars still on the road does not demonstrate durability.





15.   In the United States, vacationers account for more than half of all visitors to what are technically called “pure aquariums” but for fewer than one quarter of all visitors to zoos, which usually include a “zoo aquarium” of relatively modest scope.



Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the difference described above between visitors to zoos and visitors to pure aquariums?



(A) In cities that have both a zoo and a pure aquarium, local residents are twice as likely to visit the aquarium as they are to visit the zoo.



(B) Virtually all large metropolitan areas have zoos, whereas only a few large metropolitan areas have pure aquariums.



(C) Over the last ten years, newly constructed pure aquariums have outnumbered newly established zoos by a factor of two to one.



(D) People who visit a zoo in a given year are two times more likely to visit a pure aquarium that year than are people who do not visit a zoo.(B)



(E) The zoo aquariums of zoos that are in the same city as a pure aquarium tend to be smaller than the aquariums of zoos that have no pure aquarium nearby.



The answer is B, why?


Let me try to explain. Please comment if anyone has new idea.


When all big cities have zoo aquariums, people from big cities do not have to go to other big cities for the zoo aquarium. They can simply visit their local zoo. Therefore, vacationers visiting zoos normally do not include people from big cities. For the pure aquarium, people from all other areas might visit it because they do not have local pure aquariums. Therefore, more vacationers as a percentage of total visitors visit pure aquariums. Does it make sense?



7#
发表于 2004-5-16 11:25:00 | 只看该作者

真是糟糕,错过了MINDEFREE大侠的在线答疑,怎么没收到要在线答疑的系统消息呢? 自由以为在答疑前会收到CD发的系统消息呢.


??? I am still here...


8#
发表于 2004-5-16 11:49:00 | 只看该作者

mindfree,依你之见,这道网上争论得沸反盈天的关于magazine-like catalog的题目的正确答案究竟该是什么? 预致谢意

A mail order company recently had a big jump in clothing sales after hiring a copywriter and a graphic artist to give its clothing catalog a magazine-like format designed to appeal to a more upscale clientle.The company is now planing to launch a housewares catalog using the same concept.
The company's plan assumes that
a)other housewares catalogs with magazinelike formats do not already exist
b)an upscale clientelte would be interested in a housewares catalog
c)the same copywriter and graphic artist could be employed for both the clothing and housewares catalogs
d)a magazinelike format requires a copywriter and a graphic artist
e)customers to whom the old clothing catalog appealed would continue to make purchases from catalogs with the new format

I chose B, and I explained in the original post. It is on the eighth page of that post. D is self-contradictory. If the concept refers to hiring the two persons, D apparantly indicate that "concept" actually refers to the magazine styel. If the concept refers to the managzine style, D is not relevant because we are not talking about hiring the two persons any more. If concept refers to hiring two persons for the magazine style, it is still not correct because if the magazine style does not require hiring the two persons, the argument still holds. The purpose of hiring the two persons is to make the catalogue magazinelike. There is nowhere in the argument that the company have to hire the same persons.




[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-17 19:49:45编辑过]
9#
发表于 2004-5-16 12:06:00 | 只看该作者
Thank you so much, mindfree!,  your guide is really helpful to me. appreciate!!!
10#
发表于 2004-5-16 12:17:00 | 只看该作者
and by the way, could you please tell me where I can get the Og解释 of the CR?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-6 14:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部