ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 34562|回复: 59
打印 上一主题 下一主题

偶遇新题,供大家练习用 :)

[精华] [复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-29 12:37:00 | 只看该作者

偶遇新题,供大家练习用 :)

The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that have adopted flood-control measures than in those that have not. Thus, flood-control projects are expensive engineering mistakes and a substantial waste of resources.

Which of the following, if true, would be most damaging to the argument above?
(A)Those areas that had not suffered flood damage before 1980 are the only ones that have not adopted flood-control measures
(B)Since 1980, those areas that have taken flood-control measures have suffered greater flood damage than they did in the previous decade
(C)The cost of flood damage has increased every year since 1980
(D)Faulty engineering has not been the only cause of the failure of flood-control projects
(E)The amount of rainfall since 1980 has been substantially greater than normal

沙发
发表于 2004-4-29 12:46:00 | 只看该作者

答案是E,对吗?

请楼主公布正确答案!

板凳
发表于 2004-4-29 12:57:00 | 只看该作者
It's 'B'. right?
地板
发表于 2004-4-29 13:18:00 | 只看该作者
A
5#
发表于 2004-4-29 15:41:00 | 只看该作者
A!
6#
发表于 2004-4-29 16:36:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得A答案说得太绝对化!

B则是加强了结论

C
E则设计了一个前题,来解膝为什么会出现题目中出现的现象,从而对结论进行了有效的削弱!

所以我认为是E!

7#
发表于 2004-4-29 16:47:00 | 只看该作者
A
8#
发表于 2004-4-29 22:43:00 | 只看该作者
d?
9#
发表于 2004-4-29 23:22:00 | 只看该作者

Actually, I choose B


The argument presents that the adoption of flood control measure brings about different cost of damage between two kinds of areas. Choice manifests that the different cost of damage between two kinds of areas might result from the heavier flood in the area adopting flood-control projects.

10#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-29 23:47:00 | 只看该作者

啊呀,不好意思,今天下午没有在网上...

其实这道题是我偶然看到的,因为大全里没有,所以贴上来了,没有什么特殊性,答案是A

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 22:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部