以下是引用rice3434在2004-4-15 19:11:00的发言:The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government`s huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future cuurrency decline. Which of the following, if true, would most serious weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines? B:The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth. 答案D:Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused decline in the dollar`s value.
那位能帮忙解释一下为什么B不对? 我知道D最贴切, 但不知道B为什么无关. 我对下面这句话理解不明:
But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government`s huge budget deficit
这里it指prediction, for翻译为"因为"吗? 这个for可把我害苦了. 如果题目要表达prediction 与deficit共同作用, 则应该是: that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had there not been the government's huge budget deficit.
既然题目用it had been for说明deficit 与prediction有关系. 而且可能是deficit导致prediction. 这样一推下来, B项deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth 也可推出deficit不能导致prediction of slower economic, 也就起了削弱作用.
请各位指点.
谢谢
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-29 3:44:16编辑过] |