大全-3-20

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.

When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.

Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?

(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.

(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.

(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.

(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.（E）

(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

：（，这个题目的问题部分没看懂。请教大牛给翻译一下并说明答案为什么是E？

解释的不错！！！ 这个情况就有点象操作系统这门课里的一个术语“死锁”

哈哈哈，妞妞联想丰富啊！

但是D为什么不对呢？

但是问题怎么理解呢?下面哪个comments是正确的if 真正的被提名者是在侯选被提名者同意以后才被告知.

我不明白这个问题问的究竟是针对提干中的proposal的comments还是针对问题中出现的这个if后面的comments.

完全晕掉!!