ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 11758|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-5-20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-2-11 23:04:00 | 只看该作者

大全-5-20

20. For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.
连题目读得都不太懂,能不能给稍微解释一下
沙发
发表于 2004-2-12 00:16:00 | 只看该作者
C ?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-2-12 20:12:00 | 只看该作者
我当时也选的是C


可是对题目不是很理解,能不能给解释一下呢

地板
发表于 2004-2-12 22:29:00 | 只看该作者
MM,这题以前我肯定也解释过,你能不能再到前两页找找,答案肯定是c


    

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-2-12 23:10:00 | 只看该作者
好的,标题大概是什么样的?


我想直接用搜索

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-2-12 23:27:00 | 只看该作者
找不到呀~~~


题目的because后面就看不大懂了:(


helphelp

7#
发表于 2004-2-13 10:19:00 | 只看该作者
这题有一个潜在的假设


如果对政府有利,则对工人阶级不利


如果对政府不利,则对工人阶级有利


原文第一句For    a    local    government    to    outlaw    all    strikes    by    its    workers    is    a    costly    mistake


所以答案c中的    more    advantageous    for    public-service    就是最好的对应


你再看看


    

8#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-2-13 16:30:00 | 只看该作者
请问这句“because    all    its    labor    disputes    must    then    be    settled    by    binding    arbitration,    without    any    negotiated    public-sector    labor    settlements    guiding    the    arbitrators”什么意思
9#
发表于 2014-9-16 21:00:37 | 只看该作者
普遍来讲strike outlaw----导致最终用bind arbitration解决-------这是costly的
但是Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers,因为对于他们没有别的替代方法。
所以C中说的正好是这个,只不过没有直接说strikes outlaw好,而是用了bind arbitration,其实都是一条线上的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 05:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部