ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3722|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全-D-2

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-1-14 19:10:00 | 只看该作者

请教大全-D-2


2. Freud’s theories of the workings of the mind, while brilliant for their day, were formulated before most of this century’s great advances in neurophysiology and biochemistry. Today, we have a far deeper understanding of the biological components of thought, emotion, and behavior than was dreamed of eighty years ago. It would be foolish to continue parroting Freud’s psychological theories as if these advances had never occurred.
It can be inferred from the passage above that the author would be most likely to favor
(A) the abandonment of most of Freud’s theories
(B) a greater reliance on biological rather than psychological explanations of behavior
(C) a critical reexamination of Freud’s place in the history of psychology
(D) a reexamination of Freud’s theories in the light of contemporary biology
(E) increased financial support for studies in neurophysiology and biochemistry答案是d
但是我真的不明白是怎么推出来的.怎么知道作者的意图是 reexamination 而不是abandonment?

沙发
发表于 2004-1-14 21:13:00 | 只看该作者
呵呵,你应该是把parroting 的意思看错了
你再查查字典吧,会有收获的
parroting 的反义词可不是abandon哦
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-1-14 21:28:00 | 只看该作者
OK , THANKS FRIED EGG  GG
CHECKING!
地板
发表于 2004-1-14 22:58:00 | 只看该作者
啊,你可不要把我炸了啊,呼呼
呵呵,要加水煮一下才好吃的
5#
发表于 2004-1-20 01:16:00 | 只看该作者
高啊
6#
发表于 2005-5-30 20:18:00 | 只看该作者

瞬间明白了


谢谢~

7#
发表于 2006-7-11 13:15:00 | 只看该作者

不知道A中的most能不能成为排除的依据 这样的答案是否太绝对化? 

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 14:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部