閱讀不好..再問OG-145 and og-151

哈維 · 发表于 2003-12-27 02:34:00

不好意思喔..閱讀不好..
可以幫忙我解釋一下句意嗎..
我問的問題好像都有點笨,希望大家不要介意..
期望有一天也可以跟大家一樣戰勝ETS...
Happy New Year to you all....
145. Between 1975 and 1985, nursing-home occupancy rates averaged 87 percent of capacity, while admission rates remained constant, at an average of 95 admissions per 1,000 beds per year. Between 1985 and 1988, however, occupancy rates rose to an average of 92 percent of capacity, while admission rates declined to 81 per
1,000 beds per year.

151. Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

dansy · 发表于 2003-12-27 19:43:00

OG 145 请看下面连接。
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=9282&replyID=62237&skin=1
OG 151 是说科学家一般进入这个科学领域是以做重要的新的科研为目的的，而且把他们的同事也看成是抱有同样目的的人。如果有某一个科学家以向普通大众阐述科学而成名，那么科学家们就不把这个人看成他们的同事了。这个前提就是答案D，即那个“某个科学家”，那个搞科普
的科学家不是以做重要新科研为目的的。

ercizhang · 发表于 2005-1-15 03:10:00

scientists (with the goal of doing important new research) accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation,

若是colleagues--> 则一定是scientists with the goal of doing important new research

doing important new research是scientists colleague的必要条件,其逆否必然成立

scientists not with the goal of doing important new research--> not colleagues

所以文中结论no longer be regarded as a true colleague的前提是not with the goal of doing important new research,否则还是colleague

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-15 3:12:13编辑过]

juliet01192000 · 发表于 2006-3-10 22:24:00

对于151，我明白为什么选D.

但是我觉得C也对。提干的意思：只有当科学家以做重要研究为目的他才会被其他研究科学家们看成是自己的同事。

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research。

c的意思是说不做重要实验也能成为著名popularizer。

所以成为著名popularizer可以不做重要实验，而不做重要实验就不会被其他研究科学家们看成是自己的同事。所以也可以说是搭桥吧。

不知道我的理解对不对？：）

盼解答，谢谢！：）

yhq110 · 发表于 2006-3-14 22:40:00

个人愚见：不做重要实验可以成为popularizer，但成为popularizer不一定没有做重要实验啊。

也就是：成为popularizer推不出没有做重要试验，所以搭桥不成立。

huixia06 · 发表于 2006-8-1 23:26:00

B呢。

B给出的是科学家因为妒忌而不承认那些出名的人是同事。OG的解释是给出了另一个“不承认是同事”的理由，但不是the reason implied in the passage，所以不是assumption.

从何得出the reason implied in the passage就不是B这个reason呢？是否题目有“most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague” 。

conclude表明了其原因（reason）是从文中条件得出，就是所谓的implied reason。题目的精髓是，reason实际上已经给出来了，要去找assumed。所以讲别的reason不管用。

这样理解对吗？

布瓜丫丫 · 发表于 2006-8-29 17:16:00

是的

xiaowan · 发表于 2006-9-28 19:49:00

关于这个B,谁能再给讲讲??

pyc903 · 发表于 2006-12-12 16:42:00

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they "envy"

Envy-an emotional term, should be eliminated from correct answer choice. normally ETS doesn't expect emotional terms to be the correct answer.

fishlibai · 发表于 2009-8-23 10:30:00

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without
having completed any important research

取非的话,就是scientist can become a famous popularize
with important research

讨论的是科学家能不能成为popularizer,而不是本文的论证关键点,他的goal/motivation是什么,所以没有搭桥

閱讀不好..再問OG-145 and og-151

閱讀不好..再問OG-145 and og-151

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()