ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6718|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-I-18

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-7 20:57:00 | 只看该作者

大全-I-18

18.    Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point out that since 1987, revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees attended consultant-led seminars were lower than revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees did not attend such seminars. The critics charge that for vacuum cleaner companies, the sales seminars are ill conceived and a waste of money.
Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to the critics of sales seminars?
(A) Those vacuum cleaner companies whose sales were highest prior to 1987 are the only companies that did not send employees to the seminars.
(B) Vacuum cleaner companies that have sent employees to sales seminars since 1987 experienced a greater drop in sales than they had prior to 1987.
(C) The cost of vacuum cleaner sales seminars run by outside consultants has risen dramatically since 1987.
(D) The poor design of vacuum cleaner sales seminars is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness.
(E) Since 1987, sales of vacuum cleaners have risen twenty percent.
请问答案A怎么解释? 怎么这么别扭,好像说倒了. 多谢各位NN!
沙发
发表于 2003-12-8 11:08:00 | 只看该作者
原文的意思就是参加了培训的不如没有参加培训的,所以培训没用
找出一个削弱
a说的就是这个没有培训的厂呢以前就很赚钱,所以现在参加培训的厂呢没有它赚钱也不奇怪,但是培训可能使得他们的差距缩小了啊,这就可以说明培训还是有用的,这就是对原文的削弱了
板凳
发表于 2003-12-25 03:22:00 | 只看该作者
看来看去还是觉得A不对是说倒了,大家帮忙看看!
地板
发表于 2003-12-25 03:33:00 | 只看该作者
兜了一圈回来看明白了谢谢炒蛋
5#
发表于 2005-9-7 18:38:00 | 只看该作者
3x
6#
发表于 2005-10-13 18:55:00 | 只看该作者
是很绕的
7#
发表于 2008-4-17 23:47:00 | 只看该作者

我是这样想的,
原文推理是,
Evidence: 参加了的厂商盈利少了,
Conclusion: 所以参加这个会是没有用的。

A是说,那些没有参加的厂商,87年前盈利是最多的。意思就是说87年后盈利也少了。
所以不参加这个会,盈利也会减少。
所以参加不参加这个会,盈利都会减少。所以WEAKEN了其Evidence。

8#
发表于 2009-1-17 15:57:00 | 只看该作者
 Those vacuum cleaner companies whose sales were highest prior to 1987 are the only companies that did not send employees to the seminars.
companies whose sales were highest prior to 1987 和 companies that did not send employees to the seminars 之间在集合上是什么关系?这句话怎么翻译啊 ?
9#
发表于 2009-1-19 18:53:00 | 只看该作者
同一个,集合重叠
10#
发表于 2009-9-16 03:14:00 | 只看该作者
为什么 (e)选项不对,我认为它说的是其时这个sales seminars是有效的,它增加了sales,只是可能有别的原因存在才使revenue不能上去。我认为这个削弱了原来对它浪费钱的说法。谢谢。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 14:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部