ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 27784|回复: 63
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助:GWD25-Q22

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-5-11 11:33:00 | 只看该作者

求助:GWD25-Q22

没找到讨论贴……

GWD25-Q22

Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms

are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street

corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone,

these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we

propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the

number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.

 

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the

proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?

 

A.     The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private tele-

phones and records where they came from.

B.     Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately

five million dollars annually.

C.    A telephone call can provide the fire department with more informa-

tion about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed

from an alarm box.

D.    Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire depart-

ment’s capacity for responding to fires.

E.     On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones

in Springfield are out of service.

                           Answer:C

我怎么觉得是A呀?C好像并不能使假警报减少啊 A的话因为可以追查到private telephones的来源,所以假报警的人就不敢打了呀 减少了假警报而且without hampering people’s ability to report a fire  谁能解释一下?谢谢~

推荐
发表于 2012-12-13 11:33:02 | 只看该作者
OG的原题啊!OG标答就是A.

原文的主要问题是恶作剧电话,因此目的是reduce prank call。

A项:如果消防局取消了alarm box又可以追踪一切私人电话,那就匿名的恶作剧电话肯定会减少啊。

C项:即使telephone有这个优势,但不能解决恶作剧火警的问题。如果问题是alarm box不能很好的帮助火警救援,C项才能supportive吧
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-5-11 22:00:00 | 只看该作者
没有人解答?……
板凳
发表于 2007-5-11 23:24:00 | 只看该作者

few month ago, I vote for C ; however, this time I stand with you.

C is talking about something that will happen after the call is made. But conclusion is talking about the ablilty of report that private calling has, the content or following is not the point of the conclusion.

conclusion has two requirements:1.reduce prank calls 2.private calls can be made by people to report fire alarm.

As we know, the argument has saied that virtually,everyone has a private call so everybody could use it to report a fire. Just thinking, alarm box at the corner of street has no function of saying everything to firehouse so private call is better relatively.

Reduce prank calls: most of them came from alarm box, if we cut the amount of them and use private calls to replace these boxes, it will make sense when private calls have access to almost everyone.

A could meet the needs of these 2 requirements. I vote for A this time.

open to discussion...

地板
发表于 2007-6-14 11:11:00 | 只看该作者
agree
5#
发表于 2007-6-14 11:32:00 | 只看该作者

我觉的还是选C:

因为题干中讨论的是fire alarm boxes 和 private call 之间的优劣势,只有C选项是直接讨论这个话题,是最相关的,其他的都不是合适的选项。A项是support了结论,但是从与题中讨论的话题无关的方面入手。

6#
发表于 2007-6-14 11:58:00 | 只看该作者

是C.

A只是说police trace location by private phones,没说private phones可以自动知道地点。比如你想private phones包括固定电话和手机。

7#
发表于 2007-6-14 12:58:00 | 只看该作者

同意A  gonghao斑竹分析地很详细  

C讲 通过电话有更多信息可以提供给fire department 如比nature size等 但是不能解决prank calls 这个问题  其实题目关键还是说去解决prank calls但同时不影响人们报告火灾

8#
发表于 2007-7-18 11:58:00 | 只看该作者
Support A

通篇都是说prank calls,当然降低prank calls是主要目的。C是无关,因为题目本身已经说了:virtually everyone has access to a private telephone。所以without hapering people's ability已经成立,不需要C画蛇添足说telephone还有更多好处,那些好处对减少prank calls无效。
9#
发表于 2007-10-13 13:53:00 | 只看该作者
A.................
10#
发表于 2007-10-21 13:08:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得A更象assumption
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-13 00:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部