ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2029|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助OG 98谢谢

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-18 22:50:00 | 只看该作者

求助OG 98谢谢

Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants, are so efficient that Hotco will sell one to the Clifton Asphalt plant for no payment other than the cost savings between the total amount the asphalt plant actually paid for oil useing its former burner during the last two years and the total amount it will pay for oil using the Hotco burner during the next two years. On installation, the plant will make an estimated payment, which will be adjusted after 2 years to equal the actual cost savings.

Which of the following if it occured , would constitute a disadvantage for Hotco of the plan descrubed above?

a. Another manufactuer's introduction to the market of a similar efficient burner

b. The Clifton Asphalt plant's need for more than one burner

c. Very poor efficiency in the Clifton Asphalt plant's old new burner

d. A decrease in the demand for asphalt

e. A steady increase in the price of oil begining soos after the new burner is installed

答案为E, 但是既然油价上涨,旧款和新款的BURNER 耗油量都不变,那么COSTSAVING 不是增加了吗,那个卖机器的公司应该更有利啊?

沙发
发表于 2007-4-18 23:47:00 | 只看该作者
别忘了oil using its former burner during the last two years和oil using the Hotco burner during the next two years比,old burner的油价不会变
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 17:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部