ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A drug that is highly effective in treating many types of infection can, at present, be obtained only from the bark of the ibora, a tree that is quite rare in the wild. It takes the bark of 5,000 trees to make one kilogram of the drug. It follows, therefore, that continued production of the drug must inevitably lead to the ibora's extinction.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 13869|回复: 29
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教逻辑og-14题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-8-12 11:25:00 | 只看该作者

请教逻辑og-14题



og逻辑的第14道题我实在不理解,有那位高手师傅可以帮忙解释一下,我的邮箱ffanghua@hotmail.com,非常感谢了


沙发
发表于 2003-8-12 11:27:00 | 只看该作者
能不能把题目写出来呀!!!!

我想除了了zeros以外,没有人会把OG放旁边,一边上网一边看的!
   
如果有的话,云里来雾里去的!!
谁能看懂呀!!

多谢!
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-8-12 13:24:00 | 只看该作者
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks .As a result ,they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt .
which of the following ,if true ,nost seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above ?
A   many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat .
B   automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need ot pay for the increased injuries of deaths of people not wearing seat belts .
C   passagers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings .
D   the rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws os greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws
E   in autonobile accidents ,a great number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured that are passengers who do wear seat belts .
地板
发表于 2003-8-12 13:46:00 | 只看该作者
呵.........我中午也刚回去看了!!

前提是:
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks


解释2是:
as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks


演绎方向:因果型!

一般来说,因果型的weaken是他因解释前提即可!

可这道题的答案是:B、
也就是他因否认结论!
因为他使insurance升高,所以伤害了其他人!

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-8-12 16:05:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢八戒大哥
6#
发表于 2004-1-31 12:21:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢!
关键在于怎么理解“伤害他人”这个概念。通常国内的交通安全的宣传,都是说要注意遵守规章制度(戴安全带也属于其中之一),减少事故发生率,免得造成自己和别人的生命和财产的损失,对自己和对别人都有好处。如果从这个角度理解,那么应该选D。我就是选的D。:(
不过想想也对,不带安全带,万一发生事故,应该是驾驶者受到的伤害更大,跟其他人没有必然的联系。而如果驾驶者收到伤害,保险公司要赔偿,因此提高了保险金,这对于其他守法的驾驶者来说是不公平的,因而是一种“伤害”可以称为是“间接伤害”。
不过,根据费费的解释,通常出现无关内容的选项是要淘汰的。这里的保险公司就是文中没有提到的,而且也是weaken的结论,不是weaken原因,叫人想不通!
7#
发表于 2004-4-17 16:52:00 | 只看该作者
weaken可以有无关内容出现的。
8#
发表于 2005-5-19 16:58:00 | 只看该作者
可否将保险和保险公司等同理解,就不至于出现新的概念。
9#
发表于 2005-7-14 20:18:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用耳朵在2004-1-31 12:21:00的发言:
谢谢!
关键在于怎么理解“伤害他人”这个概念。通常国内的交通安全的宣传,都是说要注意遵守规章制度(戴安全带也属于其中之一),减少事故发生率,免得造成自己和别人的生命和财产的损失,对自己和对别人都有好处。如果从这个角度理解,那么应该选D。我就是选的D。:(
不过想想也对,不带安全带,万一发生事故,应该是驾驶者受到的伤害更大,跟其他人没有必然的联系。而如果驾驶者收到伤害,保险公司要赔偿,因此提高了保险金,这对于其他守法的驾驶者来说是不公平的,因而是一种“伤害”可以称为是“间接伤害”。
不过,根据费费的解释,通常出现无关内容的选项是要淘汰的。这里的保险公司就是文中没有提到的,而且也是weaken的结论,不是weaken原因,叫人想不通!

车险中有一种叫作“弟三者责任险”,是强制性保险,这是汽车拥有者必须购买的保险,目的是出车祸后,能够第三者(非汽车拥有者)以赔偿,所以无论谁受伤,只要保了险,保险公司都要赔偿。

10#
发表于 2005-10-11 21:40:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ffanghua在2003-8-12 13:24:00的发言:
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks .As a result ,they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt .
which of the following ,if true ,nost seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above ?
A   many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat .
B   automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need ot pay for the increased injuries of deaths of people not wearing seat belts .
C   passagers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings .
D   the rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws os greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws
E   in autonobile accidents ,a great number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured that are passengers who do wear seat belts .

推理过程:只要不伤害其他人,就有权利选择是否佩戴安全带

结论:每个人有权利决定自己是否带安全带

削弱:不带安全带又确实伤害了其他人(不符合不伤害他人的前提)



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-11 21:42:06编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 05:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部