ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4032|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]OG 43请答疑,谢谢

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-16 23:34:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]OG 43请答疑,谢谢

1.OG 43请答疑,谢谢
43. In the minds of many people living in England, before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes, the
opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimaginable place that was considered the end of the world.
(A) before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes
(B) before there was Australia, it was the antipodes
(C) it was the antipodes that was Australia
(D) Australia was what was the antipodes
(E) Australia was what had been known as the antipodes


为什么说选项DEdistort the original meaning,看了og提问总结还是不明白.

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-16 23:59:00 | 只看该作者

og解释如下:

D is imprecise in suggesting that australia was considered the antipodes after it became australia. E similarly distorts the original meaning.

板凳
发表于 2004-9-18 04:06:00 | 只看该作者
这道题的关键在于Australia有两层意思,一层是澳大利亚这个国家,另一层是澳大利亚这块土地,A的意思是before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes在澳大利亚这块土地成为澳大利亚这个国家前,这个土地(it)是antipodes;而D的意思成为Australia was what was the antipodes = Australia was the antipodes澳大利亚是antipodes,岂不是改变句意了;C中前半句未划线部分In the minds of many people living in England, it ...这里的it从语法角度只可能指代England,而逻辑上,这个指代是不通的,所以C中的it缺乏指代对象。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-18 18:41:00 | 只看该作者

thanks!!

now no puzzle will disturb me any more!!

5#
发表于 2005-9-9 05:46:00 | 只看该作者
A is best, but I am confused at explaination that in C, it refers to England.Why can't we say that "it was... that/who..." 强调句型?
6#
发表于 2005-12-9 01:36:00 | 只看该作者

rt316是最勤奋的大牛,几乎有问必答,非常令人感动!本帖的指点可谓经典!

7#
发表于 2006-10-22 16:22:00 | 只看该作者

C: substituting Australia for it produces a nonsensical statement.
                        

8#
发表于 2008-11-13 18:48:00 | 只看该作者
顶3楼的,赞
9#
发表于 2009-8-3 01:23:00 | 只看该作者

呼~~~看了这么多帖,还是rt316说的最清楚!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 14:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部