og 235 help

A與B的選項二者選其一

我不懂的是...為何A選項中無法以人"Miller"當作spanning more than fifty years的主詞..

而一定要以Miller's career當作主詞呢?

在我的理解認為a與b選項不管以誰當主詞都說的通啊...

請眾高手能為在下解惑...thx

A与B的选项二者选其一

我不懂的是...为何A选项中无法以人"Miller"当作spanning more than fifty years的主词..

而一定要以Miller's career当作主词呢?

在我的理解认为a与b选项不管以谁当主词都说的通啊...

请众高手能为在下解惑...thx

没有看出考点。

考点是逻辑意思。

如果选A，就是Miller 跨越了50年，逻辑意思不对。而是说他的职业生涯跨越了50年。

我的理解是，这个被spanning修饰的逻辑主语要做两个谓语的主语，一个began，还有一个culminated而culminated的状语是in ....honor 所以只有career才可以担当这个角色。

看来这里的疑问不少，我的疑问在于

235. Spanning more than fifty years, Friedrich Miiller began his career in an unpromising apprenticeship as a Sanskrit（梵语） scholar and culminated in virtually every honor that European governments and learned societies could bestow.

(A) Miiller began his career in an unpromising apprenticeship as

(B) Miiller's career began in an unpromising apprenticeship as

(C) Miiller's career began with the unpromising apprenticeship of being

(D) Miiller had begun his career with the unpromising apprenticeship of being

(E) the career of Miiller has begun with an unpromising apprenticeship of

c中apprenticeship of being a Sanskrit（梵语） scholar 错误在哪里？还是没有这样的用法？刚好c还有begin with的结构

同问，有NN知道吗？？？

i checked on dictionary...

usually it says "to begin with" 是去开始的意思...

在国外..光讲 begin 或 to begin with 都是通的..所知有限...

所以DE 要加to 吗?? OG 没说, 我想不是一定的

而begin in 的问题我想 浅龙勿用 解释的很好了

Began是vi. in an unpromising apprenticeship 是介宾短语结构,在句子中做状语.

还盼NN解答~ 顺便帮我看看233啊~~谢谢!