Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only 24 days.
A.
C. they had for any previous campaign
D.in their previous campaigns
E. for any previous campaigns
我接受关于应该用had had的说法,但是对这个for 实在越来越不理解。。
大N们快救命啊。。。
举报
far more supplies than ((those/the supplies/what) they had had) for any previous campaigns
than在比较时可以起到代词的作用。 也就是than可以起到than (those/the supplies/what)的作用。
tianwan斑竹,能不能再给点than在比较中做代词的例子?
还有,就是,they had had的主谓结构什么时候能省啊?通常不是用主语(省略助动词)吗?
谢谢
谢谢Tianwan斑竹,解决了我正想问的问题!
不同意这种补全方式,they had had前面并没有呀,我觉的直接补一个supplies就ok了,就是一个介词宾语的比较亚,
I don't think you can use “for its previous compaigns" here,
for you can't compare the supplies for one compaign to the supplies for previous compaigns.
发表回复
手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 16:57 京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
ChaseDream 论坛
© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.