ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 15352|回复: 28
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全956

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-11 13:53:00 | 只看该作者

大全956

Baker was perhaps not the most gifted soloist in the orchestra, but the conductor felt what was lacking in his technical skill was more than made up by the passion with which he played the music.


B) what he lacked in technical skill was more than made up by


C)whatever was lacking in technical skill was more tahn made up for by


D) whatever he lacked in technical skill was more than made up for by


E) whatever he lacked in technical skill he more than made up by


这题以前好像有人问过。但是我用关键词956没找到。谁能解释一下lack 和lacking 的用法,还有what 和whatever.


谢谢,答案B

沙发
发表于 2004-3-11 15:49:00 | 只看该作者
lacking进行时,文中读不出有正在进行的意思。whatever意思是无论什么,文章说演奏技术上的欠缺,what的指代已经很清楚了,再来whatever意思有点过,不过我认为这不是主要的,主要还是make up和make up for的区别。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-3-11 22:25:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用jnlvo在2004-3-11 15:49:00的发言:
lacking进行时,文中读不出有正在进行的意思。whatever意思是无论什么,文章说演奏技术上的欠缺,what的指代已经很清楚了,再来whatever意思有点过,不过我认为这不是主要的,主要还是make up和make up for的区别。


谢谢提醒,我又差了make up 和make up for, 意思相近,但还是有区别的。以前用中文理解还是有偏差。


1 make up for



to make a bad situation better, or replace something that has been lost



The team will be anxious to make up for a disappointing start to the season. I don't eat breakfast but I make up for it at lunch. The good days more than make up for the bad ones.


再问:lacking 为什么不能理解为形容词呢?

地板
发表于 2004-3-12 00:29:00 | 只看该作者

1,spend: sb spend sth; cost: sth cost sb.... fficeffice" />



Lack 就像spend,主语永远是人。Lacking: be lacking in是一个固定搭配,主语也永远是人。



选项A把lack当成cost来用,肯定错。



2,make up, make up for都有弥补的意思



The passion with which he played the music more than made up what he lacked in technical skill. 为了强调宾语,将主动句的宾语提前作为被动句的主语。



3,More than=highly,very much等等表示较大程度的程度副词,在这里是个程度副词短语,注意!!than在这里绝对不是一个介词。



例如:我们可以说 He is deeply(greatly/highly/not a little/no end/all too/ever so/more than) impressed. 不管用哪一个都表示 He is deeply impressed.



ETS总是用这些很拽的词来减慢我们的阅读速度,但是只要我们熟悉了这些所谓正式用语(当然需要很长时间的积累),这种句子其实并不可怕。





[此贴子已经被作者于2004-3-12 2:26:17编辑过]
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-3-12 11:11:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢,tianwan.
6#
发表于 2004-4-22 01:37:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用tianwan在2004-3-12 0:29:00的发言:

1,spend: sb spend sth; cost: sth cost sb....

Lack 就像spend,主语永远是人。Lacking: be lacking in是一个固定搭配,主语也永远是人。


大全979:


        The failing of the book lies not in a lack of attention to scientific detail but in the depiction of scenes of life and death in the marine world with emotional overtones that reduce the credibility of the work.


(A) the depiction of scenes of life and death in the marine world with emotional overtones that


(B) fact that it depicts marine world scenes of life and death as having emotional overtones that


(C) depiction of scenes of life and death in the marine world, whose emotional overtones


(D) depiction of marine world scenes of life and death, which have emotional overtones and thusA


(E) fact that if depicts scenes of life and death in the marine world, whose emotional overtones


这题中的in a lack of sth.是不是lack的另外一种用法?谢谢!





7#
发表于 2004-8-1 17:07:00 | 只看该作者

因为make up和make up for两个都是多义词,在本题的语境中语义相近,所以此题主要考查的应该不是他们的区别。

我觉得还是这个what和whatever里面的文章。除了语气上后者强,还有什么玄机呢?比如说后者在语义上是否发生了变化?用这个more than强调之后,是应该要求用whatever也引导一个强调语气与之配合呢,还是有了more than就不用再强调了呢?

请教。

8#
发表于 2004-12-29 13:54:00 | 只看该作者

ding

9#
发表于 2005-3-1 04:11:00 | 只看该作者
会不会选两个答案的ETS都给分呢....喜喜
10#
发表于 2006-4-4 20:24:00 | 只看该作者
ding
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-5 09:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部