ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2848|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 89 : another question

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-5-13 01:13:00 | 只看该作者

OG 89 : another question

89. A recent national study of the public schools shows that (there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were) four years ago.

     This correct answer is " there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were." My question is why they use "were" not " was"?
沙发
发表于 2003-5-13 04:07:00 | 只看该作者
Good question.

The sentence is comparing the Times instead of computer.

, (there are) four times as many as there were four years ago.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-5-13 10:24:00 | 只看该作者
Thanks you so much.
Now I understand that in this sentence it is actually saying "four times as many computers as there were...” Since "computers" are a plural form, we should use "were".
地板
发表于 2003-5-16 11:53:00 | 只看该作者
似是而非
5#
发表于 2005-8-7 10:14:00 | 只看该作者
我看大家讨论的应该不会作为某题的第一考点
6#
发表于 2009-8-18 05:44:00 | 只看该作者
我认为,更确切地说,比较的是computer的个数,而不是times
7#
发表于 2009-8-18 06:08:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用shakra在2009/8/18 5:44:00的发言:
我认为,更确切地说,比较的是computer的个数,而不是times

这是正确解释

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-2 21:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部