求GWD29-Q15 with 修饰问题

21: GWD-29-Q15

In little more than a decade, Argentina has become the world’s leading exporter of honey, with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets, almost half of which going to the United States.

A.      with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets, almost half of which going

B.       with the sale of nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it that goes

C.      with the sale to foreign markets of nearly 90,000 tons a year, with almost half of it going

D.      selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it goes

E.       selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, with almost half going

答案给的E,但是我选的A

题目说的是A这个地方变成世界上领先的蜂蜜出口国,每年向国外市场销售90000吨蜂蜜,其中一半销往美国

A 中用sold 表示一个完成了的情况,明显优于E中的selling ,且A中用with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets,为A处成为世界领先的蜂蜜出口国提供了条件支持:既with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign markets,Argentina has become the world’s leading exporter of honey.

E中的selling表示一个进行的时态,一个正在进行的行为无法给一个完成了的结果做支持,而后半部分的with almost half going如果修饰主语A就变成了with almost half going to the United States,Argentina has become the world’s leading exporter of honey逻辑意思已经改变了.

不知道我这个想法的问题在哪里,找了半天讨论没找到,

还请高手指点,大伙拍砖讨论

我觉得问题不是出在with...sold和selling...作伴随的问题上. 在语法和逻辑上,这两种结构作伴随都没有太大地改变句子的原意:作伴随状语时,过去分词表示完成或被动(阿根廷是蜂蜜出口大国,每年有90,000吨蜂蜜卖出),现在分词表示正在发生或发生了的(阿根廷是蜂蜜大国,每年都会卖90,000吨蜂蜜).

问题貌似出在which的指代不明上面.which可以指代market,也可以指代90,000吨,产生了歧义.

不知道这样解释通不通?

如果E后边的with介词短语可能造成修饰前边分词和主语2种情况的话不是一样有歧异的可能吗?

再顶

修饰成分应该尽量靠近被修饰成分.虽然我做过的题目不算很多,不过我碰到的那些修饰成分和被修饰成分中间隔了东西的选项一般都是错的.也就是说with部分修饰selling...比较合理.

不过就文中内容来判断,无论with是修饰那个部分,half都只能指代honey(前半句的honey或90,000吨),貌似逻辑上也没有不通的地方.

呵呵,事实上90,000吨说的也是HONEY. 再就是跳跃修饰容易出现漏洞,所以才有了"修饰部分要尽量靠近被修饰部分"的官方解释(OG11里面有).

不过还是你的解释比较make sense.

顶一个.

一眼看上selling，所以先把ABC踢走。D的逻辑错了，只好选E。说真的，没一个我喜欢的。