以下是引用xinfaxian在2005-8-5 10:20:00的发言:(A) achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be
(C) achieving in farm animals a consistency of quality and production that was once thought to be 请问,为什么A 里就有animals as thought to be 的修饰歧义;而C 里只能是跳跃修饰a consistency;没有修饰quality/production 的歧义呢?
其实,我觉得这个词的关键是逻辑意思和对as用法的理解,A选项中,as应该起的不是代词的作用(as的做代词用法是固定的比如as...as,the same as),而只能是连词的作用;也就是说,as从句后面的主语是省略的,补足主语,这里似乎有歧义。而从逻辑意思上来说,用that指代consistency更准确。 |