ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5999|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

最新真题一套 14

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-17 01:32:00 | 只看该作者

最新真题一套 14

14.With cloning technology, scientists are approaching what has long been the ultimate goal of modern husbandry: (achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be) limited to manufactured goods.
(A) achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be
(B) achieving farm animals with a consistency of quality and production as were once thought of as
(C) achieving in farm animals a consistency of quality and production that was once thought to be
(D) achievement of farm animals whose consistency of quality and production are the same as what were once thought to he
(E) achievement of farm animals at a consistency of quality and production once thought of as
答案:C
为什么不是A?
沙发
发表于 2003-12-17 03:09:00 | 只看该作者
"achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be limited to manufactured goods."
Here should use passive form, or seems the former thought something.
板凳
发表于 2003-12-17 12:15:00 | 只看该作者
a) 不知道是quality还是production还是both   in farm animals
c) 把in animals提前,更清晰
地板
发表于 2003-12-17 12:34:00 | 只看该作者
关键是thought to be修饰什么,A变成修饰animal了
5#
发表于 2003-12-17 12:39:00 | 只看该作者
可是
think of as不是更正确吗,E为什么不对呢?C用that从句罗嗦了吧
6#
发表于 2003-12-18 14:10:00 | 只看该作者
thought 修飾 consistency, 選項E中,achievement 與 consistency 都可以被修飾,有歧義。而且偏重于修飾 achievement, 因爲後面的consistency 是用at 連接 句子的主幹是名詞achievement. 大家有什麽看法?
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-19 17:39:00 | 只看该作者
因为C中的that was修饰与它并不紧邻的名词a consistency。that was 紧接在 quality and production 后,如果去掉that was就会误认为once thought to be修饰quality and production ,修饰对象错误,因而逻辑意思发生改变。
think of as后边一般接名词(请见OG 182),think of A to be后面可接形容词。:)
请多指教!
8#
发表于 2005-8-5 10:20:00 | 只看该作者

(A) achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be

(C) achieving in farm animals a consistency of quality and production that was once thought to be


请问,为什么A 里就有animals as thought to be 的修饰歧义;而C 里只能是跳跃修饰a consistency;没有修饰quality/production 的歧义呢?



9#
发表于 2005-8-5 11:12:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用xinfaxian在2005-8-5 10:20:00的发言:

(A) achieving a consistency of quality and production in farm animals as once thought to be

(C) achieving in farm animals a consistency of quality and production that was once thought to be


请问,为什么A 里就有animals as thought to be 的修饰歧义;而C 里只能是跳跃修饰a consistency;没有修饰quality/production 的歧义呢?




其实,我觉得这个词的关键是逻辑意思和对as用法的理解,A选项中,as应该起的不是代词的作用(as的做代词用法是固定的比如as...as,the same as),而只能是连词的作用;也就是说,as从句后面的主语是省略的,补足主语,这里似乎有歧义。而从逻辑意思上来说,用that指代consistency更准确。

10#
发表于 2005-8-5 13:02:00 | 只看该作者
哇,哪里那么多真题?哪来的呀?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 06:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部