ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Lacking information about energy use, people tend to overestimate the amount of energy used by equipment, such as lights, that are visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate that used by unobtrusive equipment,such as water heaters.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 13723|回复: 36
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 8中的that用法

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-13 16:25:00 | 只看该作者

OG 8中的that用法

8. Lacking information about energy use, people tend to overestimate the amount of energy used by equipment, such as lights, that are visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate that used by unobtrusive equipment, such as water heaters.
(A) equipment, such as lights, that are visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate that
(B) equipment, such as lights, that are visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate it when
(C) equipment, such as lights, that is visible and must be turned on and off and underestimate it when
(D) visible equipment, such as lights, that must be turned on and off and underestimate that
(E) visible equipment, such as lights, that must be turned on and off and underestimate it when

请问ETS为什么用that,而不用which,这里不是非限制性定从句嘛?
沙发
发表于 2003-12-13 17:53:00 | 只看该作者
such as lights 是插入语,that 是修饰equipment.
板凳
发表于 2003-12-13 22:43:00 | 只看该作者
that 是指代the amount of energy

在这种对比性的句式中,单数用that,复数用those.
记住就行。
地板
发表于 2003-12-14 01:03:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得that 不是修饰 the amount of energy。 难道 the amount  is visible and can be turn down and turn off??
5#
发表于 2003-12-14 01:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用motorola00在2003-12-13 17:53:00的发言:
such as lights 是插入语,that 是修饰equipment.


Agree.
6#
发表于 2003-12-14 04:08:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用motorola00在2003-12-14 1:03:00的发言:
我觉得that 不是修饰 the amount of energy。 难道 the amount  is visible and can be turn down and turn off??


同意
7#
发表于 2003-12-14 04:13:00 | 只看该作者
then when r 'that' and 'which' used?
what's the difference?
8#
发表于 2003-12-14 10:50:00 | 只看该作者
这是限定性定于从句,所以用that.
9#
发表于 2003-12-14 11:11:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用motorola00在2003-12-14 1:03:00的发言:
我觉得that 不是修饰 the amount of energy。 难道 the amount  is visible and can be turn down and turn off??


他说的是第二个THAT~~~

你说的是第一个THAT
10#
发表于 2003-12-14 11:43:00 | 只看该作者
oh... 就第一个that 而言,不能用which, 否则就变成限制性定语从句必须修饰lights了。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 01:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部