ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1730|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd29-14 -- NN plz help

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-6-19 14:44:00 | 只看该作者

gwd29-14 -- NN plz help

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q19: GWD-29-Q14

In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.

 

  1. arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
  2. arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
  3. a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights
  4. a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights
  5. a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women

The key is E, I chose A.

Questions:

1. can a treatise argue?

2. In E, isnt it unclear about which "for" is parallel with "for changes in the married women’s property laws"?

Plz help, NN

沙发
发表于 2007-6-19 14:50:00 | 只看该作者

1,是的可以argue

2,后面有for changes前面就必须有一个for词组跟它对称,A只有for women明显不对称,更错

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-6-19 15:09:00 | 只看该作者

that is true, I overlooked A's trick part: reversing "to have" and "for women" so A is definitely out.

As long as treatise can argue, E is better.

thx

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 09:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部