gwd17-14,答案是否值得商榷？

Q14:

Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete one day may be partners the next.

1. Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete


2. Although the lines of competition are clearly defined in industries that are more established, they are blurred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as competing companies


3. The lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, unlike the Internet where they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete


4. Unlike more established industries, where the lines of competition are clearly defined, they are burred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as companies that compete


5. Unlike more established industries, with clearly defined lines of competition, those of the Internet industry are blurred and indistinct, as competing companies

   Answer: B

我在A|B间犹豫，最后，还是觉得A更好些。虽然A也不完美。

但是B的competing companies 后面接 one day，觉得很别扭。

大家的意见？

我也在A，B间犹豫过，但是觉得A中的 more established industries这个修饰有点问题，就去选了B。

一点小看法。

我觉得A的 “as companies that compete one day may be partners the next"不对，应该事”as competing companies one day may be partners the next."

欢迎指教

Q14:

Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete one day may be partners the next.

vote for A,   in industries that are more established （adj。）, 明显redundant， 相对来说，as companies that compete， 因为compete是实意动词，不构成redundant

answer is A, Because  "one day" must form the relationship with "next". It make no sense if the two words appear in a simple sentence as adv. Furthermore, "one day" cannot modify company.

是不是THE MORE的用法错误，要么用THE MOST，要么用 IN MORE ESTABLISHED INDUSTRIES？

继续讨论。。。。