OG 56

dandan74 · 发表于 2003-9-9 14:08:00

56. Architects and stonemasons, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport.
(A)    huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya without benefit of the wheel or animal transport
(B)    without the benefits of animal transport or the wheel, huge palace and temple clusters were built by the Maya
(C)    the Maya built huge palace and temple clusters without the benefit of animal transport or the wheel
(D)    there were built, without the benefit of the wheel or animal transport, huge palace and temple clusters by the Maya
(E)    were the Maya who, without the benefit of the wheel or animal transport, built huge palace and temple clusters

我在C和E中犹豫，OG中讲到
. E is awkwardly phrased and produces a sentence fragment, because the appositive noun phrase Architects and stonemasons cannot serve as the subject of were the Maya.
我不太理解，另外C比E还有那里好呢?

tigercat · 发表于 2003-9-9 14:46:00

C中,Architects and stonemasons是the Maya 的主语同位语,而E的意思是Architects and stonemasons就是the Maya ,句子意思不合理,所以选C

dandan74 · 发表于 2003-9-9 15:12:00

我还是对同位语有些糊涂，同位语不就是两个意思一样吗? 能再讲讲吗.多谢!

tigercat · 发表于 2003-9-9 15:31:00

同位语进一步说明主语，并以逗号把主语和谓语分开。主语同位语说明主语某一方面的内容.
在C中,Architects and stonemasons说明了MAYA人的一个特性,而E是说Architects and stonemasons就是MAYA,也可以理解为除了MAYA别的人就不是Architects and stonemasons了,所以不合理,不知道我说清楚了没有
　　

dandan74 · 发表于 2003-9-10 06:34:00

I got it. Thank you very much. Tigercat!

Snazzy · 发表于 2003-12-30 15:43:00

anybody can explain why E is not good?

along · 发表于 2003-12-30 22:22:00

请教一下，我现在对同位于和独立主格有点糊涂
举个例子OG122题
其中each character a miniature calligraphic composition inside its own spuare frame
我看这就是独立主格，可是下面的解释是appositive terms

有谁可以对这两个概念再说几句吗？多谢了！

ericlai27 · 发表于 2005-1-17 23:35:00

顶一下，请问同位语与独立主格的区别

titatita · 发表于 2006-1-9 16:56:00

以下是引用ericlai27在2005-1-17 23:35:00的发言：

顶一下，请问同位语与独立主格的区别

ding

yizhoujiang · 发表于 2006-1-27 00:43:00

ding

本贴相关题目 GMATPrep-2012-SC-26 (GYKJ)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

OG 56

OG 56

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块