|
1. The Wallerstein study indicates that even after a decade young men and women still experience some of the effects of a divorce occurring when a child. (A) occurring when a child (B) occurring when children (C) that occurred when a child (D) (D) that occurred when they were children (E) that has occurred as each was a child 一直觉得OG1的问题很多，所以今天花了两个小时总结这一题，现在我把我在CD上找到的关于这个题目的问题和相关答案写下来，不清楚的地方还希望大家接着讨论。 问题1：occuring when a child 和 that occurred when a child 中的时间状语的省掉的主语是什么？ 解答1：when children ( or a child) 实际上都是省略主谓语的状语从句，只有在 从句的主谓语与主句一致时才可以省略。 解答2：The complete form of choice A is "occurring when (divorce was) a child" . Note:The clause is 'A divorce occured when (it was) a child', the logic subject (which is the subject of the clause) and link verb are omitted. So if you want to restore the omitted part, you have to use the subject of the sentence plus be. It is a rule, so memorize it. Of cource the meaning of this clause is absurd, so A is wrong. Pls refer to 《新编英语语法，章振邦》P1153，chapter36，无动词分句。 问题2：Occurring与that occurred when的区别。 解答1： 现在分词表示动作的反复、正在进行和延续，用在这里明显不合适，况且后面还有时间状语when，只能是过去分词表示一次性发生的动作 解答2： 昨天查了一本张道真的语法书，关于现在分词做定语有个解释：现在分词做定语，有三个作用，其一，相当于进行时态表示的正在进行的动作,这个好理解；其二，相当于一般时态所表示的任何时候都能发生的动作，eg:A man living in town rarely sees cows.要注意：做定语的现在分词和谓语动作必须表示相同的时间，否则只能用定语从句，不能用现在分词。eg:I muse find out the child who broke my door.(not breaking my door)如果是最后这一句所示的规则。那么该句使用that occured修饰divorce是非常合理的。 问题3：As与when的区别 解答： This question has been clearly clarified by the following statement: "as 可能强调"随着", 表示伴随动作, 好像还是一个进行中的过程, 而when 只简单表示一个时间. "You don't think the Divorce is one kind of continuous action, do you? 问题4： D中divorce后面的that能不能省掉。 这个好像没有说法。我个人认为可以，因为有的话是that定语从句，没有的话是过去分词做定语 修饰。 不知道大家如何看待这个问题4的？ 总结一下： D如果改为： occurred when they were children 也正确。 但是如果是occurring when they were children 或是 occurring as they were children 就不正确。 大家是不是这样看的？
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-4-7 00:12:00
楼主
