ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1875|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Business School Research Rankings

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-4-12 21:51:00 | 只看该作者

Business School Research Rankings

今天读到AMJ上的一篇文章,里面有一个Business School Research Rankings。文章虽然是2000年的,但是我觉得这个排名目前还是有一定的参考价值,所以把它贴了出来。全文是James S Trieschmann, Alan R Dennis, Gregory B Northcraft, Albert W Niemi Jr. "Serving multiple constituencies in business schools: M.B.A. program versus research performance" Academy of Management Journal. Dec 2000. Vol. 43, Iss. 6; p. 1130 (12 pages)



[此贴子已经被作者于2006-4-13 12:41:39编辑过]

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
沙发
发表于 2006-4-12 21:55:00 | 只看该作者
Thanks for sharing
板凳
发表于 2006-4-13 01:04:00 | 只看该作者

Thanks man.


48? LOL

地板
发表于 2006-4-13 01:54:00 | 只看该作者

Have read this before,actually have read pretty many similar papers recently. Everyone has its methodology, obviously; however, doubt the reliability of such methodology. For example, publication is one big factor. Everyone knows that some guys would like to lay back after tenture and consequently fewer publications from them. Yet, that they don't publish papers doesn't mean they are not active in research, and actually they still can help PhD candidates in seminars or like. Of course, in this paper, editor is one factor, but editors are jammed into handful schools, so I believe this factor might be better substituted by reviewer. And this paper carries too much weight on the size of the faculty.


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-4-13 2:10:46编辑过]
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-4-13 12:44:00 | 只看该作者
任何研究都会有这样那样的缺陷。这个paper发在AMJ上,是management里面非常top的journal。我想他的methodology是严格到一定程度了,吹毛求疵就没有必要了。
6#
发表于 2006-4-13 13:37:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:



近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 11:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部