- UID
- 824503
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-10-30
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
今天比較忙,以下是初稿…想必有很多錯誤的用詞和文法,結果還是超出時間了…我要再加油!!麻煩前輩批改了>”<
11.5 獨立 Do you agree or disagree with the followingstatement? In the past, it was easier for people to identify what types ofcareer or job would lead to a secure, successful future
The societyin the past is different from the present society. For example, theconstruction of economy emphasized on industry, the kinds of career whichpeople were given were almost labors level. Because the economy situation wasbetter than today’s economy so that the rate of unemployment was not so serious,and people were very cherish job opportunities. Therefore, I agree that peoplein the past were easily find careers to a secure and successful future. First of all, nowadays, people arefacing economy depression, the rate of unemployment keep increased. Because of therate of unemployment, people cannot choose jobs which they are interested inbut seeking jobs which are still recruiting. Unlike present people, people wholived in the past were more luckily because many global events which stimulatedeconomy to keep growing for a long time. Economy growth needed labors so thatalmost every people in the past had a long-term career. Second, people in the past were taughtto be precious every job opportunities rather than often switched job. Although,people had experienced a long time economy growth, the poor is still poor. Peoplecared about money so that they could feed family. Once they were given jobs,they were willing to learn for their lifetime to be professional in theircareer. Unlike people in the past, modern people have better lives now, butthey lack of patience for learning a particular career for a long-time. Their workingexperiences on resumes lead them hardly find jobs. Third, before people find jobs, thereare many information channels to help modern people either search informationor learn professional skills. Therefore, for modern people, there are too manyappeals to focus on one special skill. People like to learn varied professionalfield; however, varied choices makes people hard to decide their lifelongcareer. On the contrary, because of less learning opportunities, people in thepast only can learn professional skill in factories or companies. Most peoplein the past only have one professional skill, but this particular skill helpsthem have a lifetime career. I think people are used to enjoycomfortable lives and lack of crisis attention. Even though present economyprovides lots of job opportunities, people regard them invaluable. In the past,because of the difference of the rich and the poor, most people didn’t choosekinds of jobs and were willing to devout to jobs for their lifetime. Therefore,I agree that it was easier for people in the past to identify whattypes of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Word:429 Time: 54 mins---------------------------------------------------------------- 11.5 綜合TPO21
The reading passage and theprofessor both discuss the topic of genetic modification. However, the speakerdiscords with the idea in the passage. She thinks that genetic modification isnot a good idea, and she offers several reasons to oppose the article.
The first reason is thatgenetically modified trees are not so hardier than nature trees while thereading states the opposed viewpoint. The professor says that geneticallymodified trees are not easily to survive because they pass uniform gene togeneration by generation. However, nature trees don't share the same gene andcharacteristics so that even though one of these tree are affected by climateor insects, the other trees still have possibility to survive. Second, the speaker refutesthe reading by mentioning economic benefits even though the article indicatesthat genetically modified trees brings economic benefits to those who growthem. The lecturer thinks that the seeds of genetically modified trees are moreexpensive than the seeds of nature trees. Besides, farmers who need place toplant genetically modified trees have to pay money to genetic modificationcompanies. Therefore, the professor concludes that genetically modified treescannot make farmers richer. The third reason is that genetically modified trees will damage localtrees. While the reading points out that genetically modified trees can preventover exploitation of wild trees, the professor purposes that the because of the growthrate of genetically modified trees, these trees occupy most habitat of localtrees. Besides, abundant genetically modified trees absorb most of sunlight,water and nitrogen which originally provide nutrition to local trees. To sum up, the professor in the lecture disagrees with the points in thereading. She believes that genetic modification cannot bring economic benefits,and it also endangers local trees. |
|