ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 332211abc
打印 上一主题 下一主题

cooper作业帖

[复制链接]
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-31 19:05:44 | 只看该作者
Three possible hypotheses are mentioned in the reading material talking about what is the Chaco Great House used for, but according to the profession, all of these three theory are failed to make people believe.


The first theory holds that the Chaco Great structures were residential because the structures looks like “apartment buildings”.However, a conflicting idea in the speech indicates that when examined inside of the house, it shows that there are only few fireplaces remained inside the house, which indicated that the impossibility of the residential used. Besides, very few rooms in the Great house also proves the theory unconvincing, too.



The second theory contends that the chaco structures were used to store food supplies, because the size of the great houses are suitable for the purpose. But the profession points out that there have no trace of grains found in the house, and there also lack of big containers which should be used for stored the food. So, the house could not be used as a storage place.

The third theory proposes that the houses were used as ceremonial centers, for the reasons that excavations of the mound revealed a lot of broken pots, which suppose are used for special ceremonies, however, This standpoint is also opposed by the professor. For that in the house, besides large number of broken pots, there are also found sand, stones, and other building material around the site. Hence, the evidence are just trash which is thought as remains by the constructors, cannot support the hypothesis
12#
发表于 2012-9-1 12:48:01 | 只看该作者
蓝色为意见或建议高亮为精彩绿色为总结红色为错误

Three possible hypotheses are mentioned in the reading material talking about what is the Chaco Great House used for, but according to the profession, all of these three theory(复数) are failed to make people believe.

The first theory holds that the Chaco Great structures were residential because the structures looks like “apartment buildings”. However, a conflicting idea in the speech indicates that when examinedexamining the inside of the house, it shows that there are only few fireplaces remained inside the house, which indicated that the impossibility of the residential usedused可以这样用么?). Besides, very few rooms in the Great house also proves the theory unconvincing, too.

The second theory contends that the chaco structures were used to store food supplies, because the size of the great houses are suitable for the purpose. But the profession points out that there have no trace of grains found in the house, and there also lack of big containers which should be used for stored the food. So, the house could not be used as a storage place.


The third theory proposes that the houses were used as ceremonial centers, for the reasons that excavations of the mound revealed a lot of broken pots, which suppose(这里动词连用?)are used for special ceremonies, however, This standpoint is also opposed by the professor. For that in the house, besides large number of broken pots, there are also(这里感觉应该用researchers also,不知道there be 句型可以这样用被动不 found sand, stones, and other building material around the site. Hence, the evidence are just trash which is thought as remains threwby the constructors, cannot support the hypothesis

听力的点到,用词丰富多样。就是有些句子我也不肯定。
13#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-3 23:04:51 | 只看该作者

独立9.2it is better to relax by a movie or reading a book than doing physical exer

Modern life style is now being shown by the variety of relaxations. As a result, how to plan your leisure time are becoming a popular topic of conversation, and it seems that many people have different opinions to it. Recently, people tend to focus on a argument that whether you chose movie or physical exercise to relax yourself. Because there lack perfect conclusion to convince everyone, it turns to a hot topic, when it comes to me, I prefer to chose movie and book to relax myself.

To begin with, compared with doing physical exercise, reading book is an easy way to make yourself feel relaxation. Reading book or watch movie does not need you speed much energy. Can you image what a nice feeling you will have when you sleep on the sofa and eating some potato chips? It is no doubt that watching the latest comedy can bring you a good emotion and it will definitely improve your work efficiency.

Secondly, with the rapid develop of our modern world, watching movie or reading book are more convenient than yesterday. For example, today it is a common sense that people reading book or watching movie though electronic equipments such as iphone, lap-top. This electronic equipments allow us to read book in any public places, which means that we have chance to relax ourselves at any moment and at any time. As a consequences, modern people are prefer to chose watching movie to rest because the relaxations are very convenient.

Maybe some people want to mention that doing physical exercise will strengthen your body , but they ignore one important point, after one days hard work, it is no doubt that white-collars are already run out of most energy, that is to say, this is impossible to force yourself to go to the gymnasium. So, chose doing exercise to relax yourself just exist in the mind of some people who are sports funs.

In summary, because modern people’s life style are very tight, it is too idealize to everyone that doing exercise in regular. This makes books and films become better choice when people want to relax themselves.
14#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-3 23:05:26 | 只看该作者

tpo7

the listening material and reading passage give contradictory opinions on the topic of ecocertification,, the profession donot agree with the statement that wood companies in the United States would not have adopted new, ecologically friendly practices in order to receive ecocertification.



First, the reading material state that American consumers do not place much trust in advertising claims and they also would not value or even pay attention to the ecocertification label, because there are too much advertise around them. But the profession said that When a claim is made by an independent third party such as a wood certification company, he posits, consumers respond very positively with strong acceptance of the certified product.



The profession also disagree the second point in the reading material that American consumers are likely to choose cheap wood products without certification. The profession said All the consumers are concern about the price of products, however, when the price have little difference with each other, the consumers are care about other things such as eco-friendly label.



Finally, receiving eco-certification is, according to the professor, an important strategy used by American wood companies to ensure that their products can compete against ecocertified wood products imported into the domestic market from foreign countries. According to the reading, however, this strategy is unnecessary because American consumers are likely to be content with domestically manufactured products, even if they are not ecocertified.
15#
发表于 2012-9-3 23:42:06 | 只看该作者

9.2综合写作修改,见附件

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
16#
发表于 2012-9-4 01:27:09 | 只看该作者
总体感觉没有论证得喊到位呢~~不过只是个人观点,第一次给你改作文了~~如果改得不是很好楼主一定要告诉我哪里改错了~这样我才能避免犯错~~
Modern life style is now being shown by the variety of relaxations. As a result, how to plan your leisure time are becoming a popular topic of conversation(直接hot topic) , and it seems that many people have different opinions to it. Recently, people tend to focus on a argument that whether you chose movie or physical exercise to relax yourself.(提出了两个人们争议的话题,但都没有给出人们的看法,显得繁复而又没必要) Because there lack perfect conclusion to convince everyone, it turns to(这个用法我不确定) a hot topic, when it comes to me, I prefer to chose movie and book to relax myself.

To begin with, compared with doing physical exercise, reading book is an easy way to make yourself feel relaxation(既然有compare了,就应该比较级. Reading book or watchwatching,并列关系 movie does not need you speed(这个是速度的意思) much energy. Can you image what a nice feeling you will have when you sleep on the sofa and eating some potato chips? It is no doubt that watching the latest comedy can bring you a good emotion and it will definitely improve your work efficiency. 感觉这段有点TS和论据接不上,一开始你就说看书看电影是个easy的方式relax, 那么后面就应该说明怎么简单了,你后面的论据是不消耗多少能量,这个逻辑~~我不确定是well developed 了的, 最好有数据有例子,这样才能证明你的观点呢~~

Secondly, with the rapid developdevelopment of our modern world(个人觉得modern society更好, watching movie or reading book are more convenient than yesterday(题目是和运动比较,没有说和过去比较呢~~. For example, today it is a common sense(感觉用在这里不合适,我想换成today people tend to ,或者it is a tendency for people to ~~ that people reading book or watching movie though electronic equipments such as iphone, lap-top. This electronic equipments allow us to read book in any public places, which means that we have chance to relax ourselves at any moment and at any time. As a consequences, modern people are prefer to chose watching movie to rest because the relaxations are very convenient. (这段的点也没有说准呢~~没有比较对象,既然说了看书看电影好,就要说清楚为什么运动就不好了~)

Maybe some people want to mention that doing physical exercise will strengthen your body(这个表达有点拗口,如果是对的, 里面的your也要换成their , but they ignore one important point, after one days hard work, it is no doubt that white-collars are already run out of most energy这里突然出现了一个白领,感觉有点奇怪呢~~), that is to say, this is impossible to force yourself to go to the gymnasium. So, chose doing exercise to relax yourself just exist in the mind of some people who are sports funs. (嗯~~我觉得还是没有很好的论证呢~~

In summary, because modern peoples life style are very tight(这个有点中式英语了~我不确定对,但是我上了有道,没发现这个表达呢~~, it is too idealize to everyone that doing exercise in regular. This makes books and films become better choice when people want to relax themselves.

332211abc的签名
17#
发表于 2012-9-4 19:34:57 | 只看该作者
快写吧,婷婷受命过来改文的说~
18#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-17 21:11:47 | 只看该作者

10.17

10.17
Most people can solve the important problem in their lives by themselves or help from their families;help from the government is often not necessary


agree
1,the government can not help everyone, so you need to deal some problem by yourself like old people can be cared by their  relatives and children.
2,some problem can be solved good by private person, the help form government are unnecessary and useless like education
3,the government really did some things which affective our daily life, but It is hardly to put hope on the government to deal every things.




Today, more and more people are beginning to complaint about their government, especially for the ineffective execution. And the idea that we should look forward to our government satisfactory action to solve our social problems are becoming controversial since it was been discussed many times by the publics and politics. Some politicians and citizens want to clarify this situation simply, they believe that the help from government are powerful and efficiency, if the government make decision, every problem can be settled quickly. But obviously this opinion are failed to convinced everyone. Several points in different dimensions will prove it.
First of all, the government can not bring welfare to everyone on the society, and sacrifice the interests of some part people to satisfy other part of people is one of the common ways which the government always taken, they are only sake for some balance. As a consequence of it, the majority of us who are really need some help will chose turn to our families and our relations, or deal with ourself. For example, if according to the government policy, those old people who need some medical care are ignored, who can give them help?
generally, there are many things that ruled by private can led to a good result, the help from the government is often necessary. and this I take education as a example. Today there are many private school around the world, this school solve many problems
19#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-29 22:38:00 | 只看该作者
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should focus its budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development.



Environment and economic are both key words of our time, no matter who you are, everyone want to driving a powerful car to breathe the fresh air in the mountain, that is human nature, however, few of people have to experience this perfect illusion, so, there is much discussion over should government spend its money to protect environment or develop our economic, and different people hold opposite ideas. When it to me, I think government should focus its budgets on the economic development, it is better solutions to this question, here is my explanations.



To begin with, No one can deny the importance of environment, the nature provide fresh air, clean water, healthy food to us, so protest the environment is necessary to everyone. However, to protest our environment from pollution need a lot of money, for we need to purchase professional equipments, pay for the workers and experts who are engaged to this work, and sometimes the government must give benefit to this pollution sources, the factories. All of this measures need money, so, the living residents who are failed to enjoy the friendly environment must endurance the extra finance pressure. And this huge projects are easy to end at half, because lack of money. Further more, some environment projection need take few years to complete, and maybe after few decades, it will have satisfactory effect.



Secondly, to solve environment problem need people focus for a long time, and more importantly, the idea about protest the daily environment are also needed to implant in the local people mind, let the government speed a lot of money without calculate to protest our environment are definitely bad decision. For example, the yellow river, flowing passed my hometown lanzhou, been heavily polluted during past 30 years, the lanzhou citizens were complaint for this for many years, and a lot of mayors want to clear the river, they speed a lot of money on it, but unfortunately, one of the government finance source is excavated the sand of river bank, so they are controversial to think should allow the excavated ship to take the sand of river bank. But finally they decide to development the economic first.



Finally, Maybe someone want to question the result of economic first. I will take the Thames as a good example, in 17th, the Thames are famous dirty river, the report said that at that time, the river full of  white fomes and the whole river have unplasent fumes ,you can hardly see a little fish, the citen are comlaint of the dirty river, and the government said they can do nothing about it because the government need the factory bring revene. When England became a developed contury and the citien and politics realised that environment is a important part of their daily life, they begian to clean the river. Today , people can swim in the Thames, and this is impossible in 200 years ago. This example tell us when you want to protest the environment , you must chose the economic first.



In short,Today, there are still many people who live under the traditional ideas that if you want to clean the river, you must close the factory around the river, if you want to fresh the air, you need remove the chimney from city. But the facts proved this can not solve the problem.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-31 08:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部