【求助】OG12-26的A选项outnumbering为什么不能解释为结果状语呢？之前没问过.

liisabella

OG12-26
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
我知道做伴随肯定说不通，毕竟不是同时发生的；
但是如果解释成结果状语不行吗？结果状语修饰整个句子，又不需要主语是动作的发出者。ED给SH写了很多信，结果是数量超过了写给任何人的。
求解答，谢谢！！！O(∩_∩)O~

泾渭不凡

Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington
Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few
years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and
ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886.
outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
(A)Dickinson were written over a period beginning
a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's
brother and ending shortly before Emily's death
in 1886, outnumbering
(B)Dickinson were written over a period that begins
a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's
brother and ended shortly before Emily's death
in 1886, outnumber
(C)Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few
years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother
and that ends shortly before Emily's death in
1886 and outnumbering
(D)Dickinson, which were written over a period
beginning a few years before Susan's marriage
to Emily's brother, ending shortly before Emily's
death in 1886, and outnumbering
(E)Dickinson, which were written over a period
beginning a few years before Susan's marriage
to Emily's brother and ending shortly before
Emily's death in 1886, outnumber

从一开始入门学习G，就被某牛老师深深打上烙印：该题两个选项：A&E。就是说GMAC它这道题出题有问题，很有把握的样子，感觉是行业内部定论。。。
自己学习一段时间后，觉得该老师讲的米有什么错的啊，即便要求必须选择，也应该是A。。。。
之前和别人讨论过，但是。。。一争辩起来。。。饭饭就害怕。。。求大牛直接定论啊啊啊啊。。。

泾渭不凡

神神牛牛们来啊啊啊啊。。。。。LZ恨饭饭就恨吧。。。。。求解答啊。。。。
[attachimg=80,80]98745[/attachimg]真的真的一直纠结着。。。。。。。。。。

liisabella

Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington
Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few
years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and
ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886.
outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
(A)Dickinson were written over a period beginning
a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's
brother and ending shortly before Emily's death
in 1886, outnumbering
(B)Dickinson were written over a period that begins
a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's
brother and ended shortly before Emily's death
in 1886, outnumber
(C)Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few
years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother
and that ends shortly before Emily's death in
1886 and outnumbering
(D)Dickinson, which were written over a period
beginning a few years before Susan's marriage
to Emily's brother, ending shortly before Emily's
death in 1886, and outnumbering
(E)Dickinson, which were written over a period
beginning a few years before Susan's marriage
to Emily's brother and ending shortly before
Emily's death in 1886, outnumber

从一开始入门学习G，就被某牛老师深深打上烙印：该题两个选项：A&E。就是说GMAC它这道题出题有问题，很有把握的样子，感觉是行业内部定论。。。
自己学习一段时间后，觉得该老师讲的米有什么错的啊，即便要求必须选择，也应该是A。。。。
之前和别人讨论过，但是。。。一争辩起来。。。饭饭就害怕。。。求大牛直接定论啊啊啊啊。。。

-- by 会员 泾渭不凡 (2012/4/9 20:31:50)

OG说的也对，说要看句子重心，但是做题目的时候就没往重心这方面想；
我读完A选项就觉得很对啊....
而且吧，OG经常说句子要简洁啥的，我还觉得E选项S和V离得太远呢..
求定论啊！

泾渭不凡

人工顶贴吧。。

liisabella

我也顶下

liisabella

再顶下~

superbat28

umm...悖论是这样的。
如果是结果状语，那按照语法确实outnumber修饰的是前面整个主句。

但是问题在于，按语义，outnumber应该是有主语的，就是【给dickson的信，outnumber了给其他人的信】

但是按语法，就变成了【给dickson的信是在这个阶段写的，结果是outnumber了给其他人的信】。。就悖论了。。

泾渭不凡

umm...悖论是这样的。
如果是结果状语，那按照语法确实outnumber修饰的是前面整个主句。

但是问题在于，按语义，outnumber应该是有主语的，就是【给dickson的信，outnumber了给其他人的信】

但是按语法，就变成了【给dickson的信是在这个阶段写的，结果是outnumber了给其他人的信】。。就悖论了。。

-- by 会员 superbat28 (2012/4/9 23:31:35)

[attachimg=80,80]98753[/attachimg]谢谢bat神神！！
在饭饭和LZ酱困难的时候bat神神下凡救赎偶们咯！！。。。虽然我。。。还需要再好好理解一下。。觉得有出路咯。。。
[attachimg=80,80]98754[/attachimg]智商是硬伤啊。。。。真伤心啊。。。。饭饭一定要琢磨透。。。LZ酱你肿么样？？？

babybearmm

提句子主干理解句意，就一目了然了哇~
A选项的主干是：
ED's letters to SHD were written over a period ( ), outnumbering her letter to anyone else.
主句讲述的是time (period)，v-ing 讲述的是number (outnumbering)
这两者毫不相干，所以这句话就是non-sense!

正确的句子主干是：
ED's letters to SHD (, which ____,) outnumbered her letter to anyone else.

OG12-26
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
我知道做伴随肯定说不通，毕竟不是同时发生的；
但是如果解释成结果状语不行吗？结果状语修饰整个句子，又不需要主语是动作的发出者。ED给SH写了很多信，结果是数量超过了写给任何人的。
求解答，谢谢！！！O(∩_∩)O~

-- by 会员 liisabella (2012/4/9 20:20:28)