prep2008 -sc 语法笔记勘误、查漏专贴

xiaoju0103

谢谢LZ

qiuxinlu

第183题中expect的选项解释中：D.    Expect搭配错误，不能用that从句，应该用to；were的时态问题 让人感觉expect不能加that从句，我一开始就选的D，可是看了选项解释还是有疑问，私以为改为： Expect搭配错误，不能用that sb. 再加从句，应该用to，或者改为： several industry analysts expect that automakers, in order to conserve cash, will(不清楚是不是应该改为should, 求指点) be more...

比雨还温柔

辛苦了~~~

cdlnyy

首先谢谢楼主的语法笔记。

一点修改意见：
第二部分 177. (T-4-Q12) 补充说明：“each per year并不重复。”
这么说可能容易误导。事实上each是说牛，和per year没有关系。

aeoluseros

首先谢谢楼主的语法笔记。

一点修改意见：
第二部分 177. (T-4-Q12) 补充说明：“each per year并不重复。”
这么说可能容易误导。事实上each是说牛，和per year没有关系。

-- by 会员 cdlnyy (2010/12/9 9:00:19)

you're tatolly correct!

ps:要是可以加分就好了

aeoluseros

第183题中expect的选项解释中：D.    Expect搭配错误，不能用that从句，应该用to；were的时态问题 让人感觉expect不能加that从句，我一开始就选的D，可是看了选项解释还是有疑问，私以为改为： Expect搭配错误，不能用that sb. 再加从句，应该用to，或者改为： several industry analysts expect that automakers, in order to conserve cash, will(不清楚是不是应该改为should, 求指点) be more...

-- by 会员 qiuxinlu (2010/12/2 13:03:24)

huh，其实是expect 后面掉了一个sb. 你的改法正确。另外，应该用will。
我会修正下为: D.  Expect sb. that搭配错误，只能用expect that或expect sb. to do

jbc88

PREP1-69, intent的用法 69. (28225-!-item-!-188;#058&003542)
The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.
(A) passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
(B) the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows
companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell
(C) the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows
companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
(D) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell
(E) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of
selling
答案是C.

而08里说 intent of doing错

天使追梦

有2个问题：
1、194题D项：be able to 的be可以省略吗？
之前一般都是形容词前的be和被动的be不能共用。但这里形容词的be和be able to 的be 可以共用吗？

2、210题斑斑对于which的解释。。感觉nothing is impossible。。能总结一下吗？
好比：1）a of b什么时候修饰a,什么时候修饰b?
2）“，修饰语，”什么时候跳过去，什么时候不跳？
3）形如“a of b 介词c”这种结构，一般都说which够不到，因为太远。那么这种时候which是修饰c吗？

aeoluseros

1. 可以共用的，形容词前的be是一个系动词，be able to的be也是一个系动词。
2.
（1）嗯，所以对于which的选项是比出来的。而且很多时候其实which的修饰并没有什么不对，只有不如另一个选项用得好，也就是说这个语法点很活，没有什么严格意义上的规则。
（2）还是不一定，看逻辑。如果产生歧义，那么这个which就用得不好，不能说绝对错，所以要找别的入手点来confirm这个选项的错误。如果两个选项只有这个差别，那么就用更清晰的那个。
（3）不过which这个点中也有几个小点，是必错的：A of B in C, which这里which不可能修饰B.只可能修饰A与C。

aeoluseros

PREP1-69, intent的用法 69. (28225-!-item-!-188;#058&003542)
The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.
(A) passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
(B) the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows
companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell
(C) the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows
companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
(D) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell
(E) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of
selling
答案是C.

而08里说 intent of doing错

-- by 会员 jbc88 (2010/12/16 17:50:03)

nice guesture!
I'll correct this point later.