再问OG12 128

加州女孩

128. Australian embryologists have found evidence that

suggests that the elephant is descended from an

aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a

kind of snorkel.

(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended

from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally

evolving

(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from

an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving

(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended

from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally

evolved

(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended

from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally

evolved

(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from

an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally

evolved

OG解释 B The evidence still suggests these things

about the evolution of the elephant and its

trunk, so the present-perfect verb tense is inaccurate.

1.为什么不能用完成时？划线部分前面have found不就是用的完成时吗？就是说这个证据已经找到了。那么这个证据就对现在一直有影响了哦。
2.D选项中OG说and前后的成分不是平行的，但是我觉得像D这样说似乎也无可厚非吧，不一定非要平行，这样表达也很对啊

salasbond

1. 进化是持续的，所以用于不能用完成时，除非哪个物种死了或者灭绝了。

2. D中to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved 用and把 句子和短语（its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel）并列，不平行。因为一个主语是elephant，另一个是 trunk。

lijiahui0422

1. 试着这么理解 句子试图表达科学家已经找到了一个能suggest大象如何如何的证据，而不是科学家已经找到了一个已经能suggest大象如何如何的证据，有点拗口，但是能看出来后者强加完成时的意思没什么必要
2. to suggest 很像是目的状语，found 的目的是suggest, 这里需要的是一个定语，that suggest 和suggest都成，但是因为后面还有个that引导的宾语从句，前者显得罗嗦了点

个人理解，做下参考

加州女孩

1.我大概隐隐约约可以感觉到一点，也就是说进化这个过程本身是一只在持续，而不能理解为以前发生的进化这个动作对现在还造成影响。
2.但是我知道前后两个句子是不平行的，但是也不一定and就一定要接并列的成分啊，如果要说的两个句子在逻辑上不一致那就没办法平行了啊，但是应该还是可以用and连接两个句子吧，后面那个its trunk originally evolved应该是个完整的句子吧？

加州女孩

我觉得D选项那个and应该没有用错吧，虽然前后的句子不平行，但是应该可以这样连接吧？

lijiahui0422

第二个建议多从句意去考虑，平行不能光看形势， d 用and 感觉实在suggest两件事，而实际上后半部分是一个伴随状语左前半部分的解释

加州女孩

嗯 明白了 但是貌似LS刚好说反了 这个题选E 正是suggest两件事。也就是说E加了一个that，很清晰地表达了suggest两件事，而D中没有那个that，就感觉像是后面这个句子跟前面半个句子平行，从逻辑上看不合理谢谢LS

lijiahui0422

不好意思啊...这题没看仔细搞错了,以为选c，误导你了

加州女孩

呵呵，还是很感谢你的哦 让我受益匪浅 没看仔细没关系啦