ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2088|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 - P1 中的句子求解释

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-7 13:35:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased  economic growth
from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in
today's global markets, greater profits may be turned into
investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style
eco-ineffiencient industries. Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial
system could(what??), were(复数??) it to grow much larger, generate more
total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a
smaller , less ecoefficient economy.

highlighed 的部分不是很理解,下面给出我的理解,大家来看看对么
1come in similarly ecoefficient ways,增长了以后就不环保, 后面对这句话进行解释
2 转述一下, 原文用了倒装和虚拟语气,不是很理解
If it grow much lager, vastly more ecoefficient industrial
system could generate more total waste and destroy
more habitat and species than would a  smaller , less ecoefficient economy
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-7-7 22:42:05 | 只看该作者
我觉得第二个可能是 if it were to grow much larger 的省略吧。第一个就说不清楚了。。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-7 23:03:56 | 只看该作者
it!!!! were!!
不是应该was么
地板
发表于 2010-7-8 04:45:19 | 只看该作者
另外,不能保证由于环保节能获得的经济增长会重新投入到类似的环保节能的(生产)方式,原因是在现在的全球市场上,更多的利润可能会投资在老的不节能的工业中。

后面一句是虚拟语气插入语, were it to grow much larger
甚至一个非常环保节能的工业系统,如果变得非常大的话,会比一个小的,不是那么环保节能的经济产生更多的废物和破坏更多的栖息地和物种。

Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased  economic growth
from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in
today's global markets, greater profits may be turned into
investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style
eco-ineffiencient industries. Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial
system could(what??), were(复数??) it to grow much larger, generate more
total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a
smaller , less ecoefficient economy.

highlighed 的部分不是很理解,下面给出我的理解,大家来看看对么
1come in similarly ecoefficient ways,增长了以后就不环保, 后面对这句话进行解释
2 转述一下, 原文用了倒装和虚拟语气,不是很理解
If it grow much lager, vastly more ecoefficient industrial
system could generate more total waste and destroy
more habitat and species than would a  smaller , less ecoefficient economy
-- by 会员 liberzephyr (2010/7/7 13:35:34)
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-8 11:08:06 | 只看该作者
谢谢 回答
懂了,多看看有好处的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-29 13:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部