ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2905|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于态度词的问题,以OG12第15篇文章为例

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-9 18:17:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
我在阅读的时候能留意到态度词,但是有时候不知道这个到底是作者的态度呢,还是文中主人公的态度,比如说下面这篇文章:大家看红色部分---这个more importantly说的是作者认为Lebsock用frame of reference这种研究方法是重要的呢,还是说Lebsock认为frame of reference本身是重要的---我看文章的时候觉得应该是前者,但是78题的选项B说的好像是后者,而B恰好又是正确答案。暂时先举这个例子,大家帮帮忙,谢谢了~

Two works published in 1984 demonstrate contrasting approaches to writing the history of United States women. Buel and Buel’s biography of Mary Fish (1736–1818) makes little effort to place her story in the context of recent historiography on women. Lebsock, meanwhile, attempts not only to write the history of women in one southern community, but also to redirect two decades of historiographical debate as to whether women gained or lost status in the nineteenth century as compared with the eighteenth century. Although both books offer the reader the opportunity to assess this controversy regarding women’s status, only Lebsock’s deals with it directly. She examines several different aspects of women’s status, helping to re?ne and resolve the issues. She concludes that while women gained autonomy in some areas, especially in the private sphere, they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere. More importantly, she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference: in many respects, women lost power
in relation to men, for example, as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men.
Yet women also gained power in comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate, for example. In contrast, Buel and Buel’s biography provides ample raw material for questioning the myth, fostered by some historians, of a colonial golden age in the eighteenth century but does not give the reader much guidance in analyzing the controversy over women’s status.
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-9 18:19:09 | 只看该作者

我把上面提到的78题B选项也贴上来吧

Lebsock has demonstrated the importance of frame of reference in answering questions about women’s status.
板凳
发表于 2010-1-10 16:04:34 | 只看该作者
78问的是作者所认可的Lebsock的贡献。

这一段是在评论两本书,作者更认可Lebsock的书,讲了认可的两点。More importantly后是第二点。所以,我觉得More importantly表述的是作者的态度。与Lebsock自己怎么说怎么看无关。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-1-22 22:24:39 | 只看该作者
78问的是作者所认可的Lebsock的贡献。

这一段是在评论两本书,作者更认可Lebsock的书,讲了认可的两点。More importantly后是第二点。所以,我觉得More importantly表述的是作者的态度。与Lebsock自己怎么说怎么看无关。
-- by 会员 大荣 (2010/1/10 16:04:34)



谢谢~
5#
发表于 2010-2-2 12:56:46 | 只看该作者
同问这篇文章,“frame of reference”是什么意思,不理解那一句话

77. The author of the passage mentions the supervision of
schools primarily in order to
(A) remind readers of the role education played in
the cultural changes of the nineteenth century in
the United States
(B) suggest an area in which nineteenth-century
American women were relatively free to exercise
power
(C) provide an example of an occupation for which
accurate data about women’s participation are
diffi cult to obtain
(D) speculate about which occupations were
considered suitable for United States women of
the nineteenth century
(E) illustrate how the answers to questions about
women’s status depend on particular contexts

ABCD知道为何错了,答案选的是E,有谁能解释一下选E的原因,请求帮助,谢谢啦
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-29 17:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部