ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2323|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]og12第二篇文章

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-15 14:49:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]og12第二篇文章

        A recent study has provided clues to

predator-prey dynamics in the late Pleistocene
era. Researchers compared the number of tooth
fractures in present-day carnivores with tooth

(5)   fractures in carnivores that lived 36,000 to 10,000
years ago and that were preserved in the Rancho
La Brea tar pits in Los Angeles.
The breakage
frequencies
in the extinct species were strikingly
higher than those in the present-day species.

(10)   

                  In considering possible explanations for this

finding, the researchers dismissed demographic bias
because older individuals were not overrepresented
in the fossil samples.

    
They rejected preservational
bias because a total absence of breakage in two

(15) extinct species demonstrated that the fractures
were not the result of abrasion within the pits.

They ruled out local bias because breakage data
obtained from other Pleistocene sites were similar
to the La Brea data。The explanation they consider

(20) most plausible is behavioral differences between
extinct and present-day carnivores—in particular,
more contact between the teeth of predators and
the bones of prey due to more thorough
consumption of carcasses by the extinct species.

(25) Such thorough carcass consumption implies to
the researchers either that prey availability was
low, at least seasonally, or that there was intense
competition over kills and a high rate of carcass
theft due to relatively high predator densities.

 (20) most plausible is behavioral differences between
extinct and present-day carnivores—in particular,
more contact between the teeth of predators and
the bones of prey due to more thorough
consumption of carcasses by the extinct species.

(20) most plausible is behavioral differences between
extinct and present-day carnivores—in particular,
more contact between the teeth of predators and
the bones of prey due to more thorough
consumption of carcasses by the extinct species.

(25) Such thorough carcass consumption implies to
the researchers either that prey availability was
low, at least seasonally, or that there was intense
competition over kills and a high rate of carcass
theft due to relatively high predator densities.

 (20) most plausible is behavioral differences between
extinct and present-day carnivores—in particular,
more contact between the teeth of predators and
the bones of prey due to more thorough
consumption of carcasses by the extinct species.

(25) Such thorough carcass consumption implies to
the researchers either that prey availability was
low, at least seasonally, or that there was intense
competition over kills and a high rate of carcass
theft due to relatively high predator densities.

 

        文中画线的地方不是矛盾的吗?第一段说灭绝的两个种类裂缝平率更高(breakage frequencies in the extinct species),第二段里面又说在这两种已灭绝的种类中没有裂缝(a total absence of breakage in two extinct species )好奇怪啊


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/15 14:50:04编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-9-19 11:26:00 | 只看该作者

Because "the extinct species" are carnivores

However "two extinct species" are not the same species mentioned before. Maybe they are not carnivores. Just to explain that it's not the problem of preservation

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-29 17:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部