ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 11661|回复: 20
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP2-Q15-essay#4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-5 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

PREP2-Q15-essay#4

Essay #4.  156  (21764-!-item-!-188;#058&00156-00)

 

 

Solar ponds are bodies of water in which circulation is incomplete and there is a very high salt concentration that increases with depth.  This vertical change in salinity serves to trap heat because concentrated brine in the lowest water level acts as a collector and storage area for solar heat, while the less saline, lighter water at the upper levels provides insulation.  Heat is thus retained in the depths.

 

 

An artificial pond of this type has been constructed on the western shore of the Dead Sea in Israel in order to test its suitability as a source of low-grade heat for conversion into electricity.  An immediate threat to the success of the venture was the growth of algae.  Water in solar ponds must be kept maximally transparent to allow penetration of light to the deep storage area.  Therefore, any particles of matter in the water, such as algae cells, that scatter or absorb light will interfere with the collection of heat.

 

 

One proposed method of controlling the algae was the application of an algicide.  However, the Dead Sea is a closed body of water without any outlet and as such is very easily contaminated.  Extensive use of chemicals in numerous future full-scale solar ponds would lead to such contamination of the Dead Sea, which now enjoys a lucrative tourist trade.

 

 

A recent experiment has supplied a more promising method for controlling the algae.  To repress the algae cells' capacity for accommodating themselves to environmental changes, the water in the solar pond was first made more saline through evaporation and then diluted by a rapid inflow of fresh water.  This shock reduced the cells' ability to regulate the movement of water through their membranes.  They rapidly absorbed water, resulting in distortions of shape, increase in volume, and impairment to motility.  Their buoyancy adversely affected, the cells sank to the bottom of the pond, where they encountered the hot waters of the storage layer and were destroyed.  This method allows for effective control of nuisance algae while leaving solar ponds as one of the cleanest technologies providing energy for human use.

 

Question #15.  156-08       (21948-!-item-!-188;#058&000156-08)

 

 

Which of the following, if true, would seriously undermine the validity of the conclusions drawn from the experiment described in the last paragraph of the passage?

 

 

(A) The algae cells that sank to the bottom of the pond were destroyed only after a time lag of twenty-four hours.

(B) The lateral motility of the algae cells that sank to the bottom of the pond was not impaired.

(C) The water with which the artificial solar pond was diluted contained microorganisms that kill algae.

(D) The algae cells that sank to the bottom of the pond were actually killed by the rapid change in pressure.

(E) The higher salinity brought about through evaporation increased the transparency of the upper levels of water in the pond.

答案是(C), 请问高人为什么(B)不对呢?? 谢谢!!

已经知道答案了.....

要weaken结论,而第二个method的结论是: This method allows for effective control of nuisance algae while leaving solar ponds as one of the cleanest technologies providing energy for human use.

(C)选项说虽然除掉了algae, 可是水里又多了microorganism, 因为不是cleanest的。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-8-5 22:49:11编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-11-28 17:39:00 | 只看该作者

啥??microorganism 是微生物,不会影响水清澈的。。。我还是不明白为什么不选b b不是说不会impaired 么?那不就是weaken么?

板凳
发表于 2008-12-26 01:41:00 | 只看该作者
We can say the pond is clear since the algae in the bottom of the pond .- Does not matter impaired or not( B is wrong)
地板
发表于 2009-6-11 13:15:00 | 只看该作者
LZ的想法也對, 可是好像有點勉強, 有用microorganisms的方法就不會是one of cleanest technologies? 一個technology是clean還是不clean, 不是和其它的technologies相對來說的嗎?

也有人說是異因同果, existence of microorganisms(異因)=>death of algae(同果)
可是"the conclusions drawn from the experiment described in the last paragraph of the passage"是"This method allows for effective control of nuisance algae while leaving solar ponds as one of the cleanest technologies providing energy for human use."
C有點undermine the validity of the experiment而不是undermine the validity of the conclusions drawn from the experiment.

還是只要the validity of the experiment被undermined了, 那the validity of the conclusions drawn from the experiment就會被undermined?
5#
发表于 2009-6-11 13:27:00 | 只看该作者
異因同果的說法, 好像也不對, 如果對, D could be the answer too.
anyone?
6#
发表于 2009-6-17 16:06:00 | 只看该作者

My thinking:

kill不等同于destroy, kill以后Algae cell不会吸水,也不会下沉,还是留在上层水里,影响transparency...

7#
发表于 2009-6-18 10:29:00 | 只看该作者
huh?
那destroyed algae會去那??
8#
发表于 2009-7-8 22:06:00 | 只看该作者

A recent experiment has supplied a more promising method for controlling the algae

方法是针对如何control algae, 而不是kill algae

C说稀释时的水中的微生物会杀死algae, 这样就完全改变了这个办法的本意, 削弱

D中的rapid change in pressure是新概念, 文中不能得出, 所以是无关选项

9#
发表于 2009-7-22 10:09:00 | 只看该作者

thx

10#
发表于 2010-4-11 21:33:16 | 只看该作者
还是不是很懂啊。。
B中既然algae没有被impair,那就会影响transparency,就相当于没有达到effective control of nuisance algae的目的啊。。。
C也可以理解,因为还有microorganism就会影响transparency,也不clean了。。。
求NN来解释一下啊~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-30 05:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部