A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.
A. that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing
B. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in
C. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because of food supplies, which were dwindling possibly as a result of increasing creatures of the seabed that were suffering from food supplies that were dwindling, possibly resulting from an increase in
D. creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing
E. creatures of the seabed that were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, which possibly resulted from increasing
620-650-640-710. 总算考出来了。这次是唯一一次敢上来放狗的。(这次机经最感谢逻辑整理小组,大爱AVA的逻辑链条整理。我QQ215575163,如果有什么问题我能帮上忙的,可以用QQ找我。验证码大写的WZH. 首先先提一下逻辑中那题,就是高速开车,别人要超车就特意让人到前面的那题。 这题是一个人的独白:“我开车有善心。别人要超我,我就让它超。但是千万别以为我是generous的。因为我这样做是for self-interest的:别人快,我也能快一点。(这句话没任何意义)”问独白人的assumption. 我选择的是:for sefl-interest的行为就不是generous的行为。 多放几道逻辑题吧。逻辑是我今天特有把握的。 一道bold face:政府要保护鱼类,要限制捕鱼总数。计划是:(BF开始)每搜渔船回来时,相关人员清点其携带鱼的数量。作者表示这方法没任何意义,因为检查带回来鱼的数量,会让那些渔民把死了的鱼丢回海里,这样就忽略了真实减少的鱼的数量。
The first one is the plan that the author want to evaluate; second one is the reasons that the evaluation based on.
过去的一种捕鱼的工具(类似钩子)非常狠毒,经常把抓上来的弄死一些。其中弄死的包括了快灭绝的品种。现在政府要换一种捕鱼方法,将原来的工具换成钝一点的钩子,这样捕上来的鱼都活着,看到珍贵品种,渔民可以将其放生。政府倡议发出后,很多渔民都换了工具。政府认为,换工具的倡议不会导致渔民利益受损。问evaluate。
我选择的是:原来那些死了的珍贵品种鱼是否能在市场上卖到好价钱。
(利益受损无非就是换工具的花费是否很大,新工具维护是否贵。要么就是捕鱼的效率是否低。再或者就是原来的东西没了,失去的那个是否可贵)
还有就是看假广告说B动漫人物在公园里出现的那题。答案绝对是:找一组相似similar的人,让他们看真广告,看他们会不会觉得B还存在过。绝对不是把原来那堆人叫回来给他们看真广告。因为这时假广告如果有影响,已经存在他们婶婶的脑海里了。
还有两个国王那题,我理解的题意是:在A国(非俩国王的国家)有史记(历史纪实)。公元前985年一月(数字不一定对)一个国王死掉,该年3月另一个接替。对这个时间的记载上没有时间标注,但是这篇记载出现的年代并不一定发生在权利交接的那年,为什么?
因为国王所在国家离A国距离很远。交通不方便什么的。
|