ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Two years ago, the government of Runagia increased by 20 percent the government-provided pensions paid to Runagians over 65. The aim of the increase was to stimulate the economy in the rural regions of the country, where most pension recipients live. Statistics, however, show that there has been no increase in economic activity in those regions since then, but that there has been noticeably more spending in the urban areas.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the increase resulted in the unintended state of affairs described?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3782|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新prep1-87,R的老人补贴的变体题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-24 12:07:00 | 只看该作者

新prep1-87,R的老人补贴的变体题

87 (31284-!-item-!-188;#058&005747)

 

Two years ago, the government of Runagia increased by 20 percent the government-provided pensions paid to Runagians over 65.  The aim of the increase was to stimulate the economy in the rural regions of the country, where most pension recipients live.  Statistics, however, show that there has been no increase in economic activity in those regions since then, but that there has been noticeably more spending in the urban areas.

 

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the increase resulted in the unintended state of affairs described?

A. Until the pensions were increased, many Runagians over 65 in rural regions had been receiving support from their children who live in urban areas.

B. The pensions were increased when the number of people below the poverty level in rural areas of Runagia reached an all-time high.

C. City-dwellers in Runagia rarely travel to rural regions of the country.

D. The Runagian postal system is so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks for pension checks to reach recipients in rural areas.

E. On average, the pensions were higher in rural than in urban areas before the increase.

正确答案是A。我理解原文是指 政府增加了pensions,目的是想刺激农村地区的经济,在那些地区住着绝大部分的recipients。但是增加后,却没有经济增长,反而在城市地区的spending变多了。

A指,在增加前,老人主要是从成立住着孩子那里得到support。 这个为什么能解释两区经济的变化呢

沙发
发表于 2009-9-24 15:54:00 | 只看该作者

我这样理解:老人原来是从城里的孩子那里得到资助的,现在他们自己增加了养老金,那就可以减少城里孩子的资助,那么孩子就可以有更多的钱可以自己支配了~

BCDE都是无关的

板凳
发表于 2009-9-26 09:31:00 | 只看该作者

同意楼上说法

地板
发表于 2010-5-24 19:09:10 | 只看该作者
这道题我也做错了。思考了一下以后同意2楼的说法。

“老人原来是从城里的孩子那里得到资助的,现在他们自己增加了养老金,那就可以减少城里孩子的资助,那么孩子就可以有更多的钱可以自己支配了”。
5#
发表于 2010-11-1 18:13:21 | 只看该作者
2楼解释得太好了。
6#
发表于 2010-11-1 21:53:18 | 只看该作者
这种答案太不直接了吧。要是考到的话不敢选啊……
7#
发表于 2011-4-19 21:50:39 | 只看该作者
这种答案太不直接了吧。要是考到的话不敢选啊……
-- by 会员 candy湘 (2010/11/1 21:53:18)





+1
8#
发表于 2011-6-30 20:09:20 | 只看该作者
这种答案太不直接了吧。要是考到的话不敢选啊……
-- by 会员 candy湘 (2010/11/1 21:53:18)






+1
-- by 会员 夜色微蓝 (2011/4/19 21:50:39)



+2


A真的没觉得就怎么好!也是太间接了吧!出题的人太奸诈!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 01:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部