prep1-85

alanis_liu

85.   (23981-!-item-!-188;#058&000656)

    

 

    

Fearing
that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to make the
corporate hierarchy rigid by inhibiting communication, some corporations shun
the use of executive titles.  A title,
however, can facilitate an executive's dealings with external businesses since
it encourages outsiders to treat the executive with respect.  The obvious compromise is for these
executives to use their titles externally but not within their corporations. 

    

Which
of the following, if true, provides the most support for the compromise
suggested above?

    

A.
Only small corporations can preserve an atmosphere of mutual respect and high
regard without having a rigid corporate hierarchy.

    

B.
Referring to an executive by using a title can encourage both those outside the
organization and inside the organization to treat the executive with respect.

    

C.
Even if it is widely known within a corporation that the corporation's
executives use executive titles outside their organizations, this knowledge
does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.

    

D.
A rigid corporate hierarchy can promote efficiency within an organization as
well as provide access to the corporation for those outside the organization.

    

E.
Although many corporate executives disapprove of rigid hierarchies on the
grounds that they inhibit communication, the vast majority of executives have
no qualms about using titles both internally and externally.

答案我选了C，但是不是很明白意思，请高手指教一下

最近做逻辑经常出现可以“感觉”出对的答案，但是明白的不透彻

yidiyuehan

原文是说内部使用职衔不好，但是外部不使用职衔也不好。所以最好的方法就是在外部使用而不在内部使用。

问题问下面哪个最能支持这种论点：

A, 牵涉 small corporations, 和原文无关，因为原文论点没有针对small corporations.

B.只是支持用职衔，而没说不用职衔。

C. 同时解释了内部不用职衔和外部用职衔，同时外部用的话不会影响到内部不用的预期效果，最能支持论点。

D.同理只是讲了使用职衔的好处。

E. 既然很多人认为在内部使用职衔不会影响到交流，反而支持了要在内部使用职衔的论点，和本论点相违背。

刚刚煎熬了SC 的部分，好久没碰CR了, 一起讨论啊.

alanis_liu

多谢，我明白了

peter3008

原文是说内部使用职衔不好，但是外部不使用职衔也不好。所以最好的方法就是在外部使用而不在内部使用。
问题问下面哪个最能支持这种论点：
A, 牵涉 small corporations, 和原文无关，因为原文论点没有针对small corporations.
B.只是支持用职衔，而没说不用职衔。
C. 同时解释了内部不用职衔和外部用职衔，同时外部用的话不会影响到内部不用的预期效果，最能支持论点。
D.同理只是讲了使用职衔的好处。
E. 既然很多人认为在内部使用职衔不会影响到交流，反而支持了要在内部使用职衔的论点，和本论点相违背。
刚刚煎熬了SC 的部分，好久没碰CR了, 一起讨论啊.

-- by 会员 yidiyuehan (2009/9/21 17:59:00)

选项B其实是weaken,结论是支持在outside用，inside不用是因为title导致了上下级的交流障碍。
B如果对那么inside也要用title了，所以错，而且B 说的是respect,不是文章说的交流，也可以确定为无关选项