ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3013|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep2-47

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-5-28 17:49:00 | 只看该作者

prep2-47

47.  (33183-!-item-!-188;#058&007560)

 

Traditionally, decision-making by managers that is reasoned step-by-step has been considered preferable to intuitive decision-making.  However, a recent study found that top managers used intuition significantly more than did most middle- or lower-level managers.  This confirms the alternative view that intuition is actually more effective than careful, methodical reasoning.

 

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

 

(A) Methodical, step-by-step reasoning is inappropriate for making many real-life management decisions.

(B) Top managers have the ability to use either intuitive reasoning or methodical, step-by-step reasoning in making decisions.

(C) The decisions made by middle- and lower-level managers can be made as easily by using methodical reasoning as by using intuitive reasoning.

(D) Top managers use intuitive reasoning in making the majority of their decisions.

(E) Top managers are more effective at decision-making than middle- or lower-level managers.

NN帮忙解释下D为什么错了top managers used intuition significantly more than did most middle- or lower-level managers不就是说主要靠直觉做决定?答案E

没想通

沙发
发表于 2009-5-28 18:24:00 | 只看该作者

fact:top managers used intuition significantly more than did most middle- or lower-level managers

conclusion:intuition is actually more effective than careful, methodical reasoning.

讲的是effective,只是多,而不管用是不能说明effective的.同样D只说了多,从fact到conclusion是有gap的

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-28 22:35:00 | 只看该作者

Got it,thanks LUCIE_SIMON

地板
发表于 2010-8-24 22:29:30 | 只看该作者
这里的middle- or lower-level managers 不算是无关因素么?我一看到他们就把这个选项排除了……
请NN解释一下吧~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 03:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部