prep1---71请教

crystal007

71.       (35329-!-item-!-188;#058&007615)

 

In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money.  However, many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.

 

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's argument?

 

(A) Many workers who have already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs.(这是什么类型的加强? )

(B) Many corporations that have failed to automate have seen their profits decline.

(C) Taxes and unemployment insurance are paid also by corporations that are not automating.

(D) Most of the new jobs created by automation pay less than the jobs eliminated by automation did.

(E) The initial investment in machinery for automation is often greater than the short-term savings in labor costs.

是根据排除法得出的，不过这是什么类型的加强？

redable

是的，加强题最直接的方法就是重复事实

-- by 会员 lollypp (2009/5/7 10:34:00)

我的想法跟這位nn有些不一致
加強題中，長出現的錯誤選項之一，就是重複文章提過的事實
(這跟MUST BE TRUE剛好相反,正確選項通常是文章提過的內容)

正確選項A 沒有錯，但並不是重複文章提過的事實
這是前提--manyworkers who lose their jobs to automation will need governmentassistance to survive
結論是 thesame corporations will eventually pay for thatassistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments
文章隱含的假設就是：失業的人仍然失業，所以才需要政府補助金
如果失業的人馬上就找到工作，這些人就不需要政府補助，公司也就不用付稅金保險了

選項A就是肯定假設，就加強結論了

lollypp

感觉是措施达目的的加强：被炒的员工找不到新工作，这些员工就要去领政府救济，促成了公司pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments这个行为。

crystal007

可是题目不是已经说了many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive，就相当于A的内容阿，所以把原文的前提重复一遍也是一种加强？

lollypp

是的，加强题最直接的方法就是重复事实

crystal007

哦     谢谢。我看来做题做晕了。

smallmole

jbc88

E呢？E也有加强吧

matchMichelle

我也觉得是假设型的。。

加强题如果要加强一个因果，就要提供一个假设去支持

wbhsky

对哦