嗯那么我来贴一下,因为我也不是很明白 63. Even though most universities retain the royalties from faculty members' inventions, the faculty members retain the royalties from books and articles they write, Therefore, faculty members should retain the royalties from the educational computer software they develop. The conclusion above would be more reasonably drawn if which of the following were inserted into the arguments as an additional premise? A. Royalties from inventions are higher than royalties from educational software programs. B. Faculty members are more likely to produce educational software programs than inventions. C. Inventions bring more prestige to universities than do books and articles. D. In the experience of most universities, educational software programs are more marketable than are books and articles. E. In terms of the criteria used to award royalties, educational software programs are more nearly comparable to books and atricles than to inventions.(正确) Argument Construction Situation: Faculty members get the royalties from their books, but universities get the royalties from faculty inventions. Faculty members should get the royalties from their educational computer software. Reasoning: What premise should be added to the argument? This argument needs to state as a premise its underlying assumption regarding the nature of computer programs. If they are like inventions, then universities should retain the royalties. If they are like books and articles,then faculty members should retain the royalties. The conclusion states that faculty members should receive royalties for educational software without stating that software is comparable to books. The missing premise must show the relationship between educational software and either inventions or books and articles. 我的疑问:Computer programs 与 inventions&books 的关系 解释的第一句话就看不懂,而且后面的like books and articles ,like inventions 又是什么意思? 感觉很奇怪的说...
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-4-6 10:26:37编辑过] |